Let $X$, $Y$ be objects in a monoidal category $\mathcal{C}$, s.t. the functors $X \otimes \_$ and $\_\otimes Y$ preserve monomorphisms. Moreover, let $A \hookrightarrow X$, $B \hookrightarrow Y$ be subobjects and $P$ be a pullback of the cospan $$X \otimes B \hookrightarrow X \otimes Y \hookleftarrow A \otimes Y.$$ Do we have $P \cong A \otimes B$? If not, what do we have to assume on $\mathcal{C}$? On the functors $X \otimes \_$ and $\_\otimes Y$? It clearly follows when $\_ \otimes \_$ preserves pullbacks of monos, but this seems a bit too much.
2026-04-03 03:35:02.1775187302
A monoidal category that preserves subobjects
74 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in CATEGORY-THEORY
- (From Awodey)$\sf C \cong D$ be equivalent categories then $\sf C$ has binary products if and only if $\sf D$ does.
- Continuous functor for a Grothendieck topology
- Showing that initial object is also terminal in preadditive category
- Is $ X \to \mathrm{CH}^i (X) $ covariant or contravariant?
- What concept does a natural transformation between two functors between two monoids viewed as categories correspond to?
- Please explain Mac Lane notation on page 48
- How do you prove that category of representations of $G_m$ is equivalent to the category of finite dimensional graded vector spaces?
- Terminal object for Prin(X,G) (principal $G$-bundles)
- Show that a functor which preserves colimits has a right adjoint
- Show that a certain functor preserves colimits and finite limits by verifying it on the stalks of sheaves
Related Questions in ABELIAN-CATEGORIES
- What is the monomorphism that forms the homology group?
- Injective objects in a category
- Category of complexes
- Snake lemma and regular epi mono factorization
- A question to Weibel’s IHA lemma 2.6.14 Part 2
- Why do the finitely generated subsheaves of a sheaf form a directed system?
- Supremum of a family of subobjects in an abelian category
- Opposite effective classes in a Grothendieck group
- Question about $\mbox{Ext}$ groups in abelian categories
- How to show that $\mathsf{Ab}$(Category of Abelian Groups) is an abelian category?
Related Questions in MONOIDAL-CATEGORIES
- Lax/colax monoidal adjunction in terms of unit and counit
- How to represent convolution matrix as a string diagram?
- Free monoidal category over a set II
- Are there "distributive bicategories"?
- Showing that naturality of this transformation follows from dinaturality of elements.
- Understanding The Equations Behind Dual Objects In Monoidal Categories
- Let $(C, \otimes, \alpha, 1, l, r)$ be a monoidal category. Show that $l_{1 \otimes A} = id_1 \otimes l_A$ and $r_{A \otimes 1} = r_A \otimes id_1$.
- Show that the unit object in a monoidal category is unique up to isomorphism.
- About the internal hom in a symmetric monoidal closed category
- Question concerning functors which are equivalences
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
sorry for necroposting; I hope this might be useful to someone.
One does not, in general, have $P\cong A\otimes B$; in fact, one doesn't even have that the arrow $A\otimes Y\to X\otimes Y$ is a monomorphism as you seem to have indicated using $\hookrightarrow$ – even if $\mathcal C$ has the pullback you are considering.
Example (of failure of pullback): Consider pointed topological spaces, with continuous functions between them that preserve their base point. In this category, a continuous injection preserving the base point is monomorphic. Take the smash product as a monoidal operation ($\otimes = \wedge$), with the space with the discrete space with two points $I=\{0,1\}$ and base point $0$ as its monoidal unit.
By definition $X\otimes I\xrightarrow\cong X\xleftarrow\cong I\otimes X$, and so the pullback of those isomorphisms is also isomorphic to $X$ (and is – in fact – as a set, the unique isomorphism $X\otimes I\to I\otimes X$ making the resulting triangle commute, since functions are subsets of pairs!)
Now, if $X\not\cong I$ then clearly the pullback $P\not\cong I\otimes I \cong I$.