While inventing exercises for a discrete math text I'm writing I came up with this $$ \binom{\binom{n}{2}}{2}=3\binom{n+1}{4} $$ It's an easy result to prove, but it got me wondering
- Is this pure coincidence, or is it a special case of some more general result of which I'm unaware?
- No matter what the answer to (1) is, is there a combinatorial proof?
This is actually a well known identity. There are combinatorial ways to prove it.
Consider $n$ objects. Consider all ${n \choose 2}$ pairs. Consider all pairs of these pairs. We get the LHS.
Consider $n$ objects and 1 distinguished object. Consider all sets of 4 objects from these.
If the 4 objects do not include the distinguished object, they correspond to 3 possible pairs of pairs, whose 4 elements are distinct. I.E. $(A,B), (C,D)$ and $(A, C), (B, D)$ and $(A, D), (B,C)$.
If the 4 objects include the distinguished object, they correspond to 3 possible pairs of pairs, which have a common element, and whose union is the 3 objects. I.E. $(A, B) , (A, C)$ and $(B,A), (B,C)$ and $(C,A), (C,B)$.
This gives us the RHS.
I'm not sure if they are generalizations, though you can experiment with choosing triples and counting carefully.