This problem is from do Carmo. In calculus, we are given this vector orthogonal to the plane and derive the equation $ax+by+cz+d=0$, but here the question seems to be asking the opposite.
I'm not sure how to go about the question. Any hints?
This problem is from do Carmo. In calculus, we are given this vector orthogonal to the plane and derive the equation $ax+by+cz+d=0$, but here the question seems to be asking the opposite.
I'm not sure how to go about the question. Any hints?
On
Pick any vector $w = (m,n,p)$ on the plane $P.$ Then, you need to prove that: $$(v,w) = am+bn+pc = 0.$$ Now, a vector on a plane is really the same as two points on a plane, call them $ Q_i = (x_i, y_i,z_i)$ with $i=1,2.$ Then, what is $m,n,p$ in terms of these coordinates? Don't also forget that $Q_i$ satisfies the equation of the plane.
Can you follow it from here?
Let $P_1 = \left(x_1, y_1, z_1\right)$ and $P_2 = \left(x_2, y_2, z_2\right)$ be any $2$ distinct points in the plane. Then $P_1 - P_2 = \left(x_1 - x_2, y_1 - y_2, z_1 - z_2\right)$ is a vector in this plane. Taking the dot product of this with $v = \left(a, b, c\right)$ gives
$$a\left(x_1 - x_2\right) + b\left(y_1 - y_2\right) + c\left(z_1 - z_2\right) \tag{1}\label{eq1}$$
As $P_1$ and $P_2$ are on the plane, they must satisfy the equation $ax + by + cz + d = 0$. Thus, this gives
$$ax_1 + by_1 + cz_1 + d = 0 \tag{2}\label{eq2}$$
and
$$ax_2 + by_2 + cz_2 + d = 0 \tag{3}\label{eq3}$$
Subtracting \eqref{eq3} from \eqref{eq2} gives
$$a\left(x_1 - x_2\right) + b\left(y_1 - y_2\right) + c\left(z_1 - z_2\right) = 0 \tag{4}\label{eq4}$$
Thus, since the dot product is $0$, then the $2$ vectors are perpendicular. As $P_1$ and $P_2$ are any $2$ points, this shows the vector $v$ is perpendicular to the entire plane.