In classical homotopy theory, there are a number of spaces which are important because they represent an interesting functor on $\operatorname{Ho(Top)}$; for example, $K(G,n)$ represents singular cohomology and $BG$ represents principal $G$-bundles. However, modern homotopy theorists know that the homotopy category is merely the truncation of a much richer structure, namely the $\infty$-category $\operatorname{Spaces}$, and both of these examples then yield representable functors from this $\infty$-category to itself. The conventional interpretation would appear to suggest that these spaces should be thought of as an "enriched" or "coherent" version of cohomology and vector bundles. Is this the case? What do these spaces look like, and are there any interesting results known about them?
2026-03-30 17:05:52.1774890352
A problem on algebraic topology.
91 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ALGEBRAIC-TOPOLOGY
- How to compute homology group of $S^1 \times S^n$
- the degree of a map from $S^2$ to $S^2$
- Show $f$ and $g$ are both homeomorphism mapping of $T^2$ but $f$ is not homotopy equivalent with $g.$
- Chain homotopy on linear chains: confusion from Hatcher's book
- Compute Thom and Euler class
- Are these cycles boundaries?
- a problem related with path lifting property
- Bott and Tu exercise 6.5 - Reducing the structure group of a vector bundle to $O(n)$
- Cohomology groups of a torus minus a finite number of disjoint open disks
- CW-structure on $S^n$ and orientations
Related Questions in HOMOLOGY-COHOMOLOGY
- Are these cycles boundaries?
- Cohomology groups of a torus minus a finite number of disjoint open disks
- $f$ - odd implies $d(f)$ - odd, question to the proof
- Poincarè duals in complex projective space and homotopy
- understanding proof of excision theorem
- proof of excision theorem: commutativity of a diagram
- exact sequence of reduced homology groups
- Doubts about computation of the homology of $\Bbb RP^2$ in Vick's *Homology Theory*
- the quotien space of $ S^1\times S^1$
- Rational points on conics over fields of dimension 1
Related Questions in HOMOTOPY-THEORY
- how to prove this homotopic problem
- Are $[0,1]$ and $(0,1)$ homotopy equivalent?
- two maps are not homotopic equivalent
- the quotien space of $ S^1\times S^1$
- Can $X=SO(n)\setminus\{I_n\}$be homeomorphic to or homotopic equivalent to product of spheres?
- Why do $S^1 \wedge - $ and $Maps(S^1,-)$ form a Quillen adjunction?
- Is $S^{n-1}$ a deformation retract of $S^{n}$ \ {$k$ points}?
- Connection between Mayer-Vietoris and higher dimensional Seifert-Van Kampen Theorems
- Why is the number of exotic spheres equivalent to $S^7,S^{11},S^{15},S^{27}$ equal to perfect numbers?
- Are the maps homotopic?
Related Questions in HIGHER-CATEGORY-THEORY
- Quillen equivalence between sSet (Joyal's model structure) and sSetCat (Bergner's one)
- What is an intuitive Geometrical explanation of a "sheaf?"
- $\infty$-categories definition disambiguation
- Applications of $\infty$-categories
- Simplicial categories and simplicial objectcs. HTT Remark 1.1.4.2
- $n$-categories and associahedrons.
- Weak notion of equivalence in a category
- The $2$-category of monoids
- Higher homotopy groups in terms of the fundamental groupoid
- Pseudolimits equivalent to limits
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Let $G$ be a topological group and $X$ be a paracompact Hausdorff topological space. Then we can define the simplicial category of principal $G$-bundles over $X$ in the following way:
Note that all the mapping simplicial sets are Kan complexes. Therefore we can take its simplicial nerve and we get an $\infty$-category. In fact it is easily seen to be an $\infty$-groupoid, a.k.a. a space, $\operatorname{Bun}_G(X)$, which I will call the space of principal $G$-bundles over $X$. Note that it is canonically pointed by the trivial bundle.
With some effort this can be made controvariantly functorial in $X$, with the functoriality given by the pullback of bundles (as usual, this is accomplished by constructing a suitable fibration over the category of topological spaces -- the details are left as an exercise).
I am going to claim that $\operatorname{Bun}_G(X)$ is equivalent to $\operatorname{Map}(X,BG)$ where $BG$ is the classifying space of $G$.
The quickest proof I know of this fact is by proving that $\operatorname{Bun}_G(-)$ is a sheaf on paracompact Hausdorff spaces for the open covering topology (this requires some work -- in particular you have to show that the restriction map $\operatorname{Map}(p,p')\to \operatorname{Map}(p|_U,p'|_U)$ to an open subset is a Kan fibration).
Then it is easy to see that its sheaf $\pi_0$ is trivial and that $\Omega\operatorname{Bun}_G(-)$ is the constant sheaf at $G$. Therefore the recognition theorem for loopspaces in an $\infty$-topos shows that $\operatorname{Bun}_G(-)$ is the constant sheaf at $BG$. Finally, arguing as in [Higher Algebra Remark A.1.4] we see that the constant sheaf at $BG$ is exactly $\operatorname{Map}(-,BG)$.
A similar argument shows that the space of fiber bundles with fiber $F$ is equivalent to the space $\operatorname{Map}(X,B\operatorname{Homeo}(F))$, where $\operatorname{Homeo}(F)$ is the simplicial group of homeomorphisms of $F$.