The only proof I've seen for this assumes that $0$ follows all the rules of arithmetic. How can we make that assumption when dividing by $0$ is a problem? I know that some people don't agree that all of the numbers follow the rules for arithmetic; for example, people say that the proof of $.99999...=1$ is invalid because arithmetic can't deal with these "infinite numbers".
2026-04-24 17:21:02.1777051262
A proof of $n*0=0$?
2.2k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
2
We take:
$$0=0$$ by zero property of addition: $$0+0=0$$ by definition of multiplication: $$a\cdot(0+0)=a\cdot0$$ by distributive law: $$a\cdot0 + a\cdot0 = a\cdot0$$ by cancellation law: $$a\cdot0=0$$
The cancellation law isn't under the field axioms and requires a proof for the above to be complete. Here's a proof:
We want to prove that if $a+c=b+c$, then $a=b$.
by the additive inverse property, we have an $c^{-1}$ such that $c^{-1}+c=0$. So by definition of addition:
$$c^{-1}+a+c=c^{-1}+b+c$$
by associativity and commutativity of addition:
$$(c^{-1}+c)+a=(c^{-1}+c)+b$$
by definition of $c^{-1}$:
$$0+a=0+b$$
by zero property of addition:
$$a=b$$
So we have proven the cancellation law.