A question about an argument in Debarre's Higher dimensional algebraic geometry

67 Views Asked by At

I'm currently reading Debarre's book Higher Dimensional Algebraic Geometry. I'm having trouble understanding his argument on page 38 concerning the scheme $Mor_d(P^1_k,P^N_k)$ parametrizing morphisms of degree $d$ from the projective line over k to projective N-space. He begins by

Let $k$ be a field. Any $k$-morphism $f$ from $P^1_k$ to $P^N_k$ can be written as ...

  1. Isn't such a $k$-morphism merely a $k$-point in the scheme?
  2. This argument (which is clear to me) leads to the following conclusion (with which I have no issue):

Therefore, morphisms of degree $d$ from $P^1_k$ to $P^N_k$ are parametrized by a Zariski open set of the projective space $P((S^dk^2)^{N+1})$.

But then how does this statement on $k$-points of $Mor_d(P^1_k,P^N_k)$ lead to his following statement on the whole scheme $Mor_d(P^1_k,P^N_k)$?

We denote this quasi-projective variety by $Mor_d(P^1_k,P^N_k)$.

In other words, what happens if we begin with any scheme over $k$ instead of the base field $k$ itself? Isn't that (i.e. describing all $S$-points for all schemes $S$ over $k$) what really characterizes the scheme $Mor_d(P^1_k,P^N_k)$? Or are $k$-points of $Mor_d(P^1_k,P^N_k)$ (which are the morphisms he begins with) enough in this case? (If yes, then why do they suffice?)

Am I missing any obvious steps?