A question on the definition of the Lebesgue integral without measure theory

518 Views Asked by At

In my book the Lebesgue integral is defined, with no reference to measure, as follows:enter image description here

and the authors proceed to show that the integral is well-defined in the sense that if two different sequences of step functions, $f_n$ and $g_n$ satisfy (a) and (b) then $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \int f_n=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \int g_n$. This is fine but it is followed by a very confusing paragraph:

enter image description here

Could you please explain to me why this is the case based on what we know? In particular, I don't see why the function $f$ must vanish outside of $(a,b)$ and why the sequence cannot exist.

Thank you in advance.