If I have four sets $A,B,C,D$ and two maps $f_1 : A \to C$ and $f_2 : B \to D$, it is easy to find a unique map $f : A\times B \to C\times D$, namely $$ f(a,b) := (f_1(a), f_2(b)). $$ But now I want to show this using the universal property of the direct produkt, and that we could construct mappings between such product in all categories. The universal property reads, that for each $f_1 : Y \to C, f_2 : Y \to D$ there exists a unique map $f : Y \to C \times D$ such that $$ f_1 = \pi_1 \circ f \qquad f_2 = \pi_2 \circ f. $$ So, to apply it in this case, I have to set $Y = A\times B$ in some way. Thinking in conrete sets, the maps $$ f_1'(a,b) = f_1(a) = (f_1\circ \pi_1)(a,b) \qquad \mbox{ and } \quad f_2'(a,b) = f_2(b) = (f_2 \circ \pi_2)(a,b) $$ would work. But to what universal property does this "ignoring" of the first or second component corresponds... I could not reduce it to the universal property of the direct product, because there I have mappings with domain an arbitrary object, but here I have mappings which have the product as domain, so everything is reversed... Any hints? Or maybe I did something wrong and this property of SETS could not be generalized to arbitrary categories and products (of two objects)...
2026-04-12 15:17:11.1776007031
A seemingly simple fact about construction of maps proven categorically, i.e. by universal properties
71 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ABSTRACT-ALGEBRA
- Feel lost in the scheme of the reducibility of polynomials over $\Bbb Z$ or $\Bbb Q$
- Integral Domain and Degree of Polynomials in $R[X]$
- Fixed points of automorphisms of $\mathbb{Q}(\zeta)$
- Group with order $pq$ has subgroups of order $p$ and $q$
- A commutative ring is prime if and only if it is a domain.
- Conjugacy class formula
- Find gcd and invertible elements of a ring.
- Extending a linear action to monomials of higher degree
- polynomial remainder theorem proof, is it legit?
- $(2,1+\sqrt{-5}) \not \cong \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$ as $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$-module
Related Questions in CATEGORY-THEORY
- (From Awodey)$\sf C \cong D$ be equivalent categories then $\sf C$ has binary products if and only if $\sf D$ does.
- Continuous functor for a Grothendieck topology
- Showing that initial object is also terminal in preadditive category
- Is $ X \to \mathrm{CH}^i (X) $ covariant or contravariant?
- What concept does a natural transformation between two functors between two monoids viewed as categories correspond to?
- Please explain Mac Lane notation on page 48
- How do you prove that category of representations of $G_m$ is equivalent to the category of finite dimensional graded vector spaces?
- Terminal object for Prin(X,G) (principal $G$-bundles)
- Show that a functor which preserves colimits has a right adjoint
- Show that a certain functor preserves colimits and finite limits by verifying it on the stalks of sheaves
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Since $A\times B$ is a product, you have projection maps $\pi_1\colon A\times B\to A$ and $\pi_2\colon A\times B\to B$ as part of the definition of product (I use the same names as for the product $C\times D$, but the context makes clear which is meant). Now we have the maps $f_1\circ\pi_1\colon A\times B\to C$ and $f_2\circ \pi_2\colon A\times B\to D$, hence by the universal property for the product $C\times D$ a unique map $f\colon A\times B\to C\times D$ such that $\pi_1\circ f = f_1\circ \pi_1$ and $\pi_2\circ f = f_2\circ \pi_2$.
More generally, if $I$ is an index set and we have maps $f_i\colon A_i\to B_i$ for all $i\in I$, the same construction gives us a unique map $f\colon \prod_{i\in I} A_i\to \prod_{i\in I} B_i$ with the property $\pi_i\circ f=f_i\circ \pi_i$ for all $i\in I$.