Let $\mathfrak{A}$ be a poset. For $a, b \in \mathfrak{A}$ we will denote $a \not\asymp b$ if only if there are a non-least element $c$ such that $c \leqslant a \wedge c \leqslant b$.
Let $\mathfrak{A}$, $\mathfrak{B}$ are posets. I call a pointfree funcoid a pair $\left( \alpha ; \beta \right)$ of functions $\alpha : \mathfrak{A} \rightarrow \mathfrak{B}$, $\beta : \mathfrak{B} \rightarrow \mathfrak{A}$ such that $$ \forall x \in \mathfrak{A}, y \in \mathfrak{B}: \left( y \not\asymp^{\mathfrak{B}} \alpha \left( x \right) \Leftrightarrow x \not\asymp^{\mathfrak{A}} \beta \left( y \right) \right) . $$
Conjecture If $\left( \alpha ; \beta \right)$ is a pointfree funcoid and $\alpha$ is a bijection $\mathfrak{A} \rightarrow \mathfrak{B}$, then $\alpha$ is an order isomorphism $\mathfrak{A} \rightarrow \mathfrak{B}$.
A weaker conjecture:
Conjecture If $\left( \alpha ; \beta \right)$ is a pointfree funcoid and $\alpha$ is a bijection $\mathfrak{A} \rightarrow \mathfrak{B}$ and $\beta$ is a bijection $\mathfrak{B} \rightarrow \mathfrak{A}$, then $\alpha$ is an order isomorphism $\mathfrak{A} \rightarrow \mathfrak{B}$.
If these conjectures are false, what additional conditions we may add to make them true? (Maybe, these are true for lattices? distributive lattices?)
Both conjectures are false for infinite posets. Take for instance any bijections of sets $\alpha,\beta$ ($\beta=\alpha^{-1}$ works fine) between $\mathbb{Z}$ and $\mathbb{Q}$. Because for all $m,n\in\mathbb{Z}$ and for all $r,s\in\mathbb{Q}$ we always have $m\asymp n$ and $r\asymp s$, there is really no condition imposed on $\alpha$ and $\beta$, but neither can be an order isomorphism.
Maybe the answer is affirmative if you look at finite posets.