I'm trying to understand different formulation of domination. Taking a field $K$ and two surjectives valuations $v$ and $w$ on it, TFAE:
- $v=w$
- $\mathcal{O}_v=\mathcal{O}_w$
- $\mathcal{O}_v\supseteq\mathcal{O}_w$ and $\mathfrak{m}_v\cap\mathcal{O}_w=\mathfrak{m}_w$
- $\mathcal{O}_v\supseteq\mathcal{O}_w$ and $\mathfrak{m}_v\supseteq\mathfrak{m}_w$
I think that's ok with that.
I'd like to have some description with uniformizer, for example
- For all uniformizer $t_w$ for $w$ one has $v(t_w)>0$
- For one uniformizer $t_w$ for $w$ one has $v(t_w)>0$
But such things would be equivalent with
- $\mathfrak{m}_v\supseteq\mathfrak{m}_w$
Is that true, how prove that?