About valuation and domination

46 Views Asked by At

I'm trying to understand different formulation of domination. Taking a field $K$ and two surjectives valuations $v$ and $w$ on it, TFAE:

  1. $v=w$
  2. $\mathcal{O}_v=\mathcal{O}_w$
  3. $\mathcal{O}_v\supseteq\mathcal{O}_w$ and $\mathfrak{m}_v\cap\mathcal{O}_w=\mathfrak{m}_w$
  4. $\mathcal{O}_v\supseteq\mathcal{O}_w$ and $\mathfrak{m}_v\supseteq\mathfrak{m}_w$

I think that's ok with that.

I'd like to have some description with uniformizer, for example

  1. For all uniformizer $t_w$ for $w$ one has $v(t_w)>0$
  2. For one uniformizer $t_w$ for $w$ one has $v(t_w)>0$

But such things would be equivalent with

  1. $\mathfrak{m}_v\supseteq\mathfrak{m}_w$

Is that true, how prove that?