A commutative ring $\mathcal R$ with identity is said to be absolutely flat if every $\mathcal R$-module is flat. I know that for an absolutely flat ring, every principal ideal is idempotent. Also, know a proof of converse using Tor functor. Is there any proof of converse without using properties of $\text{Tor}$ functor?
2026-03-25 06:16:20.1774419380
Absolutely Flat Ring
1.3k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ABSTRACT-ALGEBRA
- Feel lost in the scheme of the reducibility of polynomials over $\Bbb Z$ or $\Bbb Q$
- Integral Domain and Degree of Polynomials in $R[X]$
- Fixed points of automorphisms of $\mathbb{Q}(\zeta)$
- Group with order $pq$ has subgroups of order $p$ and $q$
- A commutative ring is prime if and only if it is a domain.
- Conjugacy class formula
- Find gcd and invertible elements of a ring.
- Extending a linear action to monomials of higher degree
- polynomial remainder theorem proof, is it legit?
- $(2,1+\sqrt{-5}) \not \cong \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$ as $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$-module
Related Questions in COMMUTATIVE-ALGEBRA
- Jacobson radical = nilradical iff every open set of $\text{Spec}A$ contains a closed point.
- Extending a linear action to monomials of higher degree
- Tensor product commutes with infinite products
- Example of simple modules
- Describe explicitly a minimal free resolution
- Ideals of $k[[x,y]]$
- $k[[x,y]]/I$ is a Gorenstein ring implies that $I$ is generated by 2 elements
- There is no ring map $\mathbb C[x] \to \mathbb C[x]$ swapping the prime ideals $(x-1)$ and $(x)$
- Inclusions in tensor products
- Principal Ideal Ring which is not Integral
Related Questions in MODULES
- Idea to make tensor product of two module a module structure
- $(2,1+\sqrt{-5}) \not \cong \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$ as $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$-module
- Example of simple modules
- $R$ a domain subset of a field $K$. $I\trianglelefteq R$, show $I$ is a projective $R$-module
- $S_3$ action on the splitting field of $\mathbb{Q}[x]/(x^3 - x - 1)$
- idempotent in quiver theory
- Isomorphism of irreducible R-modules
- projective module which is a submodule of a finitely generated free module
- Exercise 15.10 in Cox's Book (first part)
- direct sum of injective hull of two modules is equal to the injective hull of direct sum of those modules
Related Questions in FLATNESS
- Difficulty understanding Hartshorne Theorem IV.4.11
- Flat modules over a PID
- Submodule of a flat module.
- When an integral extension of integral domains is flat?
- When flat submodule is direct summand?
- Flatness in a short exact sequence. If the
- Localization and flatness
- Computing $\operatorname{Tor}^R_1(M,N)$
- Does flatness ascend through a free ring map?
- Can it be that $R[[x]]$ is flat over $R$ but not over $R[x]$?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Method 1: We just need to know that being flat is a local property, and that every module over a field is free (that's a vector space!) and a fortiori flat. First show that principal ideals being generated by idempotents implies that $R$ is locally a field, and then the conclusion follows immediately.
Method 2: At first glance this might seem unnecessarily complicated, but I prefer this argument because it generalizes well to characterizations of rings of fixed weak global dimension.
In the following approach we only need to know a few things about flatness: (1) its definition, i.e. tensoring preserves injectivity (2) that colimits of directed systems of flat modules are flat (3)$^{1}$ that if $0 \rightarrow A \rightarrow B \rightarrow C \rightarrow 0$ is exact with $A,C$ flat, then $B$ is flat.
First we reduce the problem:
Proof: First reduce to finitely generated modules, since every module is a colimit of its finitely generated submodules, and since a colimit of a directed system of flat modules is flat.
To reduce to cyclic modules, recall that any finitely generated module $M$ has a filtration $0 \subseteq M_1 \subseteq \cdots \subseteq M_n = M$ such that for any $i>0$ we have $M_{i}/M_{i-1} \cong R/I_{i}$ for some ideal $I_i$. (Note that any cyclic module $N$ is isomorphic to $R/\operatorname{Ann}_R(N)$, and take $M_i$ to be the module generated by the first $i$ generators of $M$).
Thus we have $M_1 \cong R/I_1$ flat, and inductively we show that $M_i$ is flat by considering the short exact sequence $0 \rightarrow M_{i-1} \rightarrow M_{i} \rightarrow R/I_{i} \rightarrow 0$. $\square$
Proof: This follows from the observation that if $e,f$ are idempotents then $g = e + f - ef$ is an idempotent and $ge = e, gf = f$, hence $(e,f) = (g)$. $\square$
All that remains is to prove that
Proof Firstly, it is easy to see that the module $R/eR$ is flat for any idempotent $e$. (Check this locally -- since the only idempotents of local rings are $0$ and $1$, the ideal $eR$ becomes free of rank either $1$ or $0$, and likewise for $R/eR$). Thus in our ring $R/I$ is flat for any f.g. ideal $I$.
Now for any ideal $I$, $R/I$ is the colimit of the directed system of $R/I_\alpha$ where $I_\alpha$ are the finitely generated sub-ideals of $I$ and the maps of the directed system are the canonical projections $R/I_\alpha \twoheadrightarrow R/I_\beta$ for $I_\alpha \subseteq I_\beta$. $\square$
$^{1}$ (A note about (3). Sometimes this is done with the long exact sequence for Tor, or by developing more sophisticated tests for flatness, but it can also be shown in two breezy diagram chases. The first diagram chase is in showing that if $\mathcal{C} := 0 \rightarrow A \rightarrow B \rightarrow C \rightarrow 0$ is exact and $C$ is flat, then tensoring with any module $M$ is exact. An easy approach comes from embedding $M$ in an exact sequence $\mathcal{C}' := 0 \rightarrow K \rightarrow F \rightarrow M \rightarrow 0$ with $F$ free and chasing the diagram $\mathcal{C} \otimes \mathcal{C'}$. To get the desired result (3), we then chase the diagram obtained by tensoring $0 \rightarrow N \rightarrow M$ with $0 \rightarrow A \rightarrow B \rightarrow C \rightarrow 0$ (where $A, C$ flat) and utilizing the previous fact.)