I want algebra embeddings from $\text{Mat}_n(\mathbb{C})$ into $\text{Mat}_{2n}(\mathbb{R})$ which preserve self-adjoitness and positive definiteness. So, this embedding should be involutive. Two natural embeddings are $A \mapsto \begin{bmatrix} A_R & A_I \\ -A_I& A_R\end{bmatrix}$ and $A \mapsto \begin{bmatrix} A_R & -A_I \\ A_I& A_R\end{bmatrix}$, where $A=A_R+iA_I$. So, all the *-embedding that I know has the form $A \mapsto O^T \begin{bmatrix} A_R & A_I \\ -A_I& A_R\end{bmatrix}O$ where $O$ is an orthogonal matrix. Is there any other *-embedding? If not how can we show that?
2026-04-03 09:23:30.1775208210
*algebra embedding from complex matrices into real matrices
95 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LINEAR-ALGEBRA
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- Alternate basis for a subspace of $\mathcal P_3(\mathbb R)$?
- Why the derivative of $T(\gamma(s))$ is $T$ if this composition is not a linear transformation?
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Summation in subsets
- $C=AB-BA$. If $CA=AC$, then $C$ is not invertible.
- Basis of span in $R^4$
- Prove if A is regular skew symmetric, I+A is regular (with obstacles)
Related Questions in MATRICES
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Powers of a simple matrix and Catalan numbers
- Gradient of Cost Function To Find Matrix Factorization
- Particular commutator matrix is strictly lower triangular, or at least annihilates last base vector
- Inverse of a triangular-by-block $3 \times 3$ matrix
- Form square matrix out of a non square matrix to calculate determinant
- Extending a linear action to monomials of higher degree
- Eiegenspectrum on subtracting a diagonal matrix
- For a $G$ a finite subgroup of $\mathbb{GL}_2(\mathbb{R})$ of rank $3$, show that $f^2 = \textrm{Id}$ for all $f \in G$
Related Questions in C-STAR-ALGEBRAS
- Cuntz-Krieger algebra as crossed product
- Given two projections $p,q$ in a C$^{*}$-algebra $E$, find all irreducible representations of $C^{*}(p,q)$
- AF-algebras and K-theory
- How to show range of a projection is an eigenspace.
- Is a $*$-representation $\pi:A\to B(H)$ non-degenerate iff $\overline{\pi(A) B(H)} = B(H)$?
- Spectral theorem for inductive limits of $C^*$-Algebras
- Examples of unbounded approximate units in $C^*$-algebras
- Is there a way to describe these compactifications algebraically?
- Projections in C*-algebras
- Homogeneous C*-algebras
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
This answer is incomplete; I'm just posting it to ensure it stays saved on the site and in case it is useful in its incomplete form
We aim to show that for any convolutive algebraic embedding $\Phi:\mathcal M_n(\Bbb C) \to \mathcal M_{2n}(\Bbb R)$, there is an associated orthogonal matrix $O$.
To that end, begin by considering the element $J = \Phi(i\,\text{id}_{\Bbb C^n})$. Because $\Phi$ is adjoint-preserving, the fact that $[i\,\text{id}_{\Bbb C^n}]^* = -i\,\text{id}_{\Bbb C^n}$ implies that $$ J^* = \Phi([i\,\text{id}_{\Bbb C^n}]^*) = \Phi(-[i\,\text{id}_{\Bbb C^n}]) = - \Phi(i\,\text{id}_{\Bbb C^n}) = -J. $$ Because $J$ is skew self-adjoint with $J^2 = -\text{id}_{\Bbb R^{2n}}$, we can conclude that there exists an orthogonal matrix $O_1$ such that $$ J = O_1\pmatrix{0 & -I\\ I & 0}O_1^T. $$ Indeed, the spectral theorem ensures that the matrices $J$ and $\left[ \begin{smallmatrix}0&-I\\I&0\end{smallmatrix}\right]$ are unitarily similar (since they are unitarily diagonalizable with the same eigenvalues), and it generally holds that two unitarily similar real matrices are necessarily orthogonally similar.
Conclude from the fact that $\Phi(A)$ commutes with $J$ (for all $A \in \mathcal M_n(\Bbb C)$) that we must have the form $$ \Phi(A) = O_1\pmatrix{f(A) & -g(A)\\ g(A) & f(A)}O_1^T $$ for some maps $f,g:\mathcal M_n(\Bbb C) \to \mathcal M_n(\Bbb R)$.
Now, note that for any $A \in \mathcal M_n(\Bbb R)$, $$ O_1\pmatrix{f(iA) & -g(iA)\\ g(iA) & f(iA)}O_1^T = \\ \Phi(iA) = J\Phi(A) = \\ O_1\pmatrix{-g(A) & -f(A)\\ f(A) & -g(A)}O_1^T. $$ So, we have $$ f(iA) = - g(A)\\ g(iA) = f(A). $$
A relevant note:
Your "natural" algebra embeddings arise from an embedding of the underlying spaces. In particular, consider the map $\phi_0:\Bbb C^n \to \Bbb R^{2n}$ given by $\phi_0(x + iy) = \left[ \begin{smallmatrix} x\\y \end{smallmatrix}\right]$. To compute the adjoint of $\phi_0$ relative to the usual inner product on $\Bbb R^{2n}$ and the real inner product $\langle w,z\rangle = \operatorname{Re}[w^*z]$ over $\Bbb C^n$, note that if we define $\psi:\left[ \begin{smallmatrix} x\\y \end{smallmatrix}\right] \mapsto x + iy$, then $$ \begin{align*} \left\langle \phi_0(x + iy), \begin{bmatrix}a\\b\end{bmatrix}\right\rangle &= \left\langle \begin{bmatrix}x\\y\end{bmatrix}, \begin{bmatrix}a\\b\end{bmatrix}\right\rangle = x^Ta + y^Tb\\ \left\langle x + iy, \psi\left(\begin{bmatrix}a\\b\end{bmatrix}\right)\right\rangle &= \langle x + iy, a + ib \rangle = x^Ta + y^Tb, \end{align*} $$ So, that $\psi = \phi_0^*$. With that, we have $$ \pmatrix{A_R & -A_I\\A_I & A_R} \pmatrix{x\\y} = (\phi_0 \circ A \circ \phi_0^*) (x + iy). $$ Note that for any orthogonal matrix $O$, $\phi = O^T \circ \phi_0$ induces the embedding $$ O^T\pmatrix{A_R & -A_I\\A_I & A_R}O $$ in the same way.