This is an exercise question in Appendix A of Introduction of Algebraic Geometry, Justin R Smith. I am looking for an intuition for the solution.
if $k \rightarrow K$ is an extension of fields of char $0$ and $f_1, \ldots, f_m \in K$ show that $\{f_1, \ldots, f_m \}$ are algebraically independent iff $\{df_1, \ldots, df_m \} \in \Omega_{K/k}$ are linearly independent.
This could be an outline of a possible proof.
First,let's suppose that $f_1 \dots f_m$ are algebraically indipendent. Let us consider a basis of trascendence $B=\{f_1 \dots f_m, g_1 \dots g_r\}$, so that we have the inclusions: $$ k \subseteq k(f_1 \dots f_m, g_1 \dots g_r) \subseteq K ,$$ with the last one being finite separable. Let's call the intermediate field $F$.
We have $$\Omega_{F /k}= F df_1 \bigoplus \dots \bigoplus F dg_r$$.Because of $K \supseteq F$ finite and separable, we have $\Omega_{F/K}=0$.
Using the standard exact sequences for Kahler differentials, one obtains $$\Omega_{K /k}=K df_1 \bigoplus \dots \bigoplus K dg_r .$$ One immediately obtain the linear indipendence of the differentials.
Let's do the other arrow. Let's call $L$ the field over $k$ generated by $f_1 \dots f_m$ and let us suppose that $f_1 \dots f_m$ are not algebraically indipendent.
Let's consider $B=\{f_{i_1} \dots f_{i_s}\}$ a maximal indipendent subset. Our hypothesis implies that $|B| <m$. One can see that $B$ is a trascendence basis for $L$. With exactly the same proof above, one has that $\Omega_{L/k}$ is an $L$ vector spae of dimension less than $m$ so that $df_i$ are not linearly indipendent. Having $L \subseteq K$ one obtains a contradiction.
Let me add just one more comment. It is pretty important that the characteristic is $0$. Let's take $k=\mathbb{F}_p$ and $K=\mathbb{F}_p(t)$ for some prime $p$. If we take $f_1=t^p$, one has that $f_1$ is not algebraic over $k$, while $df_1=0$.