Alternate definition on bounded variation

151 Views Asked by At

If $g:[a,b]\to \mathbb{R}$ the $g$ is of bounded variation iff $$TV(g,[a,b])=\sup\sum_{i=1}^n |g(t_i)-g(t_{i-1})|<\infty$$ where the supremum is taken over all partitions $a=t_0<t_1<\dots<t_n=b$

Question. If $g:[a,b]\to \mathbb{R}$ is of bounded variation, is it true that $$TV(g,[a,b])=\sup\sum_{i=1}^m |g(b_i)-g(a_i)|$$ where the supremum is taken over all possible finite collection $\{[a_i,b_i]:i=1,\dots,m\}$ of nonoverlapping subintervals in $[a,b]$? I need some help on this. Thanks.

1

There are 1 best solutions below

1
On BEST ANSWER

Let $(I_1,...,I_n)$ denote an ordered collection of subintervals on $[a,b]$ such that $\sup I_k \le \inf I_{k+1}$.

Let ${\cal P'}$ be the set of all such collections.

Let ${\cal P}$ be the set of partitions of $[a,b]$, it should be clear that ${\cal P} \subset {\cal P'}$.

Let $TV, TV_2$ be your definition and second formulation, respectively. I will drop the $[a,b]$ part of your notation as this is fixed here.

We have $TV(g) = \sup_{\pi \in {\cal P} } \sum_{I \in \pi} |g(\sup I) -g(\inf I)|$, and $TV_2(g) = \sup_{\pi' \in {\cal P'} } \sum_{I \in \pi'} |g(\sup I) -g(\inf I)|$

Since ${\cal P} \subset {\cal P'}$, we have $TV(g) \le TV_2(g)$.

Now suppose $\pi' \in {\cal P'} \setminus {\cal P}$. It should be clear that we can add subintervals to $\pi'$ to get a partition $\pi \in {\cal P}$ such that every interval in $\pi'$ is also in $\pi$. Furthermore, $\sum_{I \in \pi'} |g(\sup I) -g(\inf I)| \le \sum_{I \in \pi} |g(\sup I) -g(\inf I)| \le TV(g)$. Consequently, we have $TV_2(g) \le TV(g)$ and so they are equal.

Note: It is not hard to see that if the subintervals are strictly non overlapping (that is, empty intersection), then this is not true. Take $g = 1_{\{{1\over 2}\}}$ on the interval $[0,1]$. Then $TV(g) = 2$, but $TV_2(g) = 1$.