Ambiguity regarding numbering and naming of octants

268 Views Asked by At

I've only started studying $3D$ geometry and hence came about octants.

I tried combining sources online, but there seems to be a lot of ambiguity.

  1. My maths book labels the coord axes; and numbers and names the octants in a certain order, the rules for which are not specified.
  2. WolframAlpha does not label octants at all.

The ambiguity further deepens because Wikipedia says that "Octant ( + + + ) is sometimes referred to as the first octant, although similar ordinal name descriptors are not defined for the other seven octants" - which is in alignment with what WolframAlpha says - yet Wikipedia goes on to list names and numbers for all the octants (like my maths book did), without referencing a valid source as to where did it get that from.
There's even a mention of this ambiguity on the Talk page.

So, I basically want to know what exactly is the correct, authoritative numbering of octants?

Are all octants numbered and named OR is only the (+, +, +) called the first octant and are the rest ignored?

If your answer is the first part above, then please also state the correct numbering for the octants.

I know this is too trivial a problem but let's just fix it for once and for all!