Suppose $M$ is a transitive model of ZFC-powerset. If $\kappa \in M$ is a cardinal and $U$ is an ultrafilter on the boolean algebra $\mathcal P(\kappa)^M$, we say $U$ is amenable to $M$ if whenever $\{ X_\alpha : \alpha < \kappa \} \subseteq \mathcal P(\kappa)$ is in $M$, then $\{ \alpha : X_\alpha \in U \} \in M$. In these notes, Steel says that if $j : M \to N$ is elementary with critical point $\kappa$, and $U$ is the ultrafilter on $\mathcal P(\kappa)^M$ derived from $j$, then $U$ is amenable to $M$ if and only if $\mathcal P(\kappa)^M = \mathcal P(\kappa)^N$. I am able to show that $U$ is amenable to $M$ iff $\mathcal P(\kappa)^M = \mathcal P(\kappa)^{Ult(M,U)}$, but I don't see why necessarily $\mathcal P(\kappa)^{Ult(M,U)} = P(\kappa)^N$. Is the claim true, and how do you show it?
2026-03-25 21:45:07.1774475107
amenable ultrafilters
162 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LOGIC
- Theorems in MK would imply theorems in ZFC
- What is (mathematically) minimal computer architecture to run any software
- What formula proved in MK or Godel Incompleteness theorem
- Determine the truth value and validity of the propositions given
- Is this a commonly known paradox?
- Help with Propositional Logic Proof
- Symbol for assignment of a truth-value?
- Find the truth value of... empty set?
- Do I need the axiom of choice to prove this statement?
- Prove that any truth function $f$ can be represented by a formula $φ$ in cnf by negating a formula in dnf
Related Questions in SET-THEORY
- Theorems in MK would imply theorems in ZFC
- What formula proved in MK or Godel Incompleteness theorem
- Proving the schema of separation from replacement
- Understanding the Axiom of Replacement
- Ordinals and cardinals in ETCS set axiomatic
- Minimal model over forcing iteration
- How can I prove that the collection of all (class-)function from a proper class A to a class B is empty?
- max of limit cardinals smaller than a successor cardinal bigger than $\aleph_\omega$
- Canonical choice of many elements not contained in a set
- Non-standard axioms + ZF and rest of math
Related Questions in LARGE-CARDINALS
- Target of a superstrong embedding
- Possibility of preserving the ultrafilter on $\mathcal{P}_{\kappa}(\lambda)$ in V[G] after forcing with a <$\kappa$ directed closed poset?
- If $G$ is $P$-generic over $V$ and $G^*$ is $j''P$-generic over $M$ then $j$ can be extended to $V[G]$.
- Normality of some generic ultrafilter
- Does ZFC + the Axiom of Constructibility imply the nonexistence of inaccessible cardinals?
- Inaccessibility in L vs. Inaccessibility in ZFC
- Proof that the cofinality of the least worldly cardinal is $\omega$
- Inaccessible side-effects in MK
- Definition of an $\omega$-huge cardinal
- Regarding Extenders
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
The claim is false.
Assume there is a measurable $\kappa$ and for every inaccessible $\delta < \kappa$, there is a precipitous ideal on $\delta^+$. A model of this can be obtained by forcing from a model with a supercompact and a measurable above it.
Let $i : V \to M$ be the ultrapower embedding by a normal measure $U$ on $\kappa$. In $M$, there is a precipitous ideal $I$ on $\kappa^+$. Let $k : M \to N$ be a generic embedding coming from $I$. Note that $crit(k) = \kappa^+$. Let $j = k \circ i$.
$U$ is amenable to $V$, and for every $A \in \mathcal P(\kappa)^V$, $\kappa \in i(A)$ iff $\kappa \in j(A)$. So $U$ is also the ultrafilter derived from $j$. But $\mathcal P(\kappa)^M \not= \mathcal P(\kappa)^N$, since forcing with $I$ collapses $\kappa^+$.