Why an almost complex structure on real 2-dimensional manifold is integrable?
2026-03-25 14:20:01.1774448401
An almost complex structure on real 2-dimensional manifold
1.9k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in MANIFOLDS
- a problem related with path lifting property
- Levi-Civita-connection of an embedded submanifold is induced by the orthogonal projection of the Levi-Civita-connection of the original manifold
- Possible condition on locally Euclidean subsets of Euclidean space to be embedded submanifold
- Using the calculus of one forms prove this identity
- "Defining a smooth structure on a topological manifold with boundary"
- On the differentiable manifold definition given by Serge Lang
- Equivalence of different "balls" in Riemannian manifold.
- Hyperboloid is a manifold
- Integration of one-form
- The graph of a smooth map is a manifold
Related Questions in COMPLEX-GEOMETRY
- Numerable basis of holomporphic functions on a Torus
- Relation between Fubini-Study metric and curvature
- Hausdorff Distance Between Projective Varieties
- What can the disk conformally cover?
- Some questions on the tangent bundle of manifolds
- Inequivalent holomorphic atlases
- Reason for Graphing Complex Numbers
- Why is the quintic in $\mathbb{CP}^4$ simply connected?
- Kaehler Potential Convexity
- I want the pullback of a non-closed 1-form to be closed. Is that possible?
Related Questions in ALMOST-COMPLEX
- Nijenhuis tensor in local coordinates
- Natural complex-linear isomorphism between $ V_J $ and $V^- $
- Integrable almost complex structure conjugated by diffeomorphism
- Equivalence of tangential and normal stably almost complex structure
- Complex Vector Bundle vs Holomorphic Vector Bundle vs Almost Complex Structures
- Coordinate-free proof of non-degeneracy of symplectic form on cotangent bundle
- Equivalent definitions of almost complex structures
- $M$ is a complex manifold $\Leftrightarrow \overline{\partial}^2=0$
- When are almost complex structures tame?
- Equivalence of two definitions of Almost Complex Structure.
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
With respect to $J$ we get a splitting of the complexified differential forms; namely,
$$\Omega^k(X)\otimes\mathbb{C} = \bigoplus_{p+q=k}\Omega^{p,q}(X).$$
With respect to this splitting, we have the operator $\overline{\partial} : \Omega^{p,q}(X) \to \Omega^{p,q+1}(X)$ given by $\pi^{p,q+1}\circ d$ where $d$ is the exterior derivative and $\pi^{p,q+1}$ is the projection $\Omega^{k+1}(X)\otimes\mathbb{C} \to \Omega^{p,q+1}(X)$.
Integrability of $J$ is equivalent to the condition $\overline{\partial}^2 = 0$, but this is automatic on a real surface because we have
\begin{align*} \Omega^0(X)\otimes\mathbb{C} &= \Omega^{0,0}(X)\\ \Omega^1(X)\otimes\mathbb{C} &= \Omega^{1,0}(X) \oplus \Omega^{0,1}(X)\\ \Omega^2(X)\otimes\mathbb{C} &= \Omega^{1,1}(X) \end{align*}
and $\Omega^{p,q}(X) = 0$ for all other $p$ and $q$. Now note that
$$\Omega^{0,0}(X) \xrightarrow{\overline{\partial}} \Omega^{0,1}(X) \xrightarrow{\overline{\partial}} \Omega^{0,2}(X) = 0.$$
So $\overline{\partial}^2 = 0$ on $\Omega^{0,0}(X)$. Likewise, $\overline{\partial}^2 = 0$ on $\Omega^{1,0}(X)$, $\Omega^{0,1}(X)$, and $\Omega^{1,1}(X)$.
Added Later: Altenatively, we can show that for any almost complex structure $J$ on a smooth two-dimensional manifold, $N_J = 0$ where $N_J$ is the Nijenhuis tensor field of $J$. By the Newlander-Nirenberg Theorem, the vanishing of $N_J$ is equivalent to integrability.
Let $M$ be a smooth manifold with almost complex structure $J$. Recall that the Nijenhuis tensor field of $J$ is given by
$$N_J(X, Y) = [X, Y] + J[JX, Y] + J[X, JY] - [JX, JY].$$
As $N_J$ is tensorial, if $\{V_1, \dots, V_n\}$ is an ordered basis of local vector fields defined in a neighbourhood of $p$, $N_J$ vanishes at $p$ if and only if $N_J(V_i, V_j) = 0$ for all $1 \leq i, j \leq n$. Furthermore, $N_J$ is skew-symmetric, so it is enough to show that $N_J(V_i, V_j) = 0$ for all $1 \leq i < j \leq n$.
Now consider the case where $M$ is a smooth two-dimensional manifold. Fix $p \in M$ and let $V$ be a nowhere zero local vector field defined in a neighbourhood of $p$, then $\{V, JV\}$ is an ordered basis of local vector fields; to see this, note that if $JV \in \operatorname{span}\{V\}$ then $JV = kV$ so $-V = J^2V = k^2V$ which is impossible. As
\begin{align*} N_J(V, JV) &= [V, JV] + J[JV, JV] + J[V, J^2V] - [JV, J^2V]\\ &= [V, JV] + J[V, -V] - [JV, -V]\\ &= [V, JV] - J[V, V] + [JV, V]\\ &= [V, JV] - [V, JV]\\ &= 0, \end{align*}
we see that $N_J = 0$ at $p$. As $p$ is arbitrary, the Nijenhuis tensor field of $J$ vanishes, so $J$ is integrable.