Let $M$ be an Einstein manifold, I know that if dim $M\ge 3$, $M$ has a constant scalar curvature $\rho$, and $Ric=\frac{\rho}{m}g$, but I can't see how can $M$ possess a constant sectional curvature in dimension 3. can someone provide a proof?
thanks in advance!
2026-03-28 21:57:10.1774735030
An Einstein manifold in dimension 3 has a constant sectional curvature.
2.4k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL-GEOMETRY
- Smooth Principal Bundle from continuous transition functions?
- Compute Thom and Euler class
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Alternative definition for characteristic foliation of a surface
- Studying regular space curves when restricted to two differentiable functions
- What kind of curvature does a cylinder have?
- A new type of curvature multivector for surfaces?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- Show that two isometries induce the same linear mapping
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
Related Questions in MANIFOLDS
- a problem related with path lifting property
- Levi-Civita-connection of an embedded submanifold is induced by the orthogonal projection of the Levi-Civita-connection of the original manifold
- Possible condition on locally Euclidean subsets of Euclidean space to be embedded submanifold
- Using the calculus of one forms prove this identity
- "Defining a smooth structure on a topological manifold with boundary"
- On the differentiable manifold definition given by Serge Lang
- Equivalence of different "balls" in Riemannian manifold.
- Hyperboloid is a manifold
- Integration of one-form
- The graph of a smooth map is a manifold
Related Questions in RIEMANNIAN-GEOMETRY
- What is the correct formula for the Ricci curvature of a warped manifold?
- How to show that extension of linear connection commutes with contraction.
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
- Levi-Civita-connection of an embedded submanifold is induced by the orthogonal projection of the Levi-Civita-connection of the original manifold
- Geodesically convex neighborhoods
- The induced Riemannian metric is not smooth on the diagonal
- Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic notions of Harmonic maps.
- Equivalence of different "balls" in Riemannian manifold.
- Why is the index of a harmonic map finite?
- A closed manifold of negative Ricci curvature has no conformal vector fields
Related Questions in CURVATURE
- Sign of a curve
- What kind of curvature does a cylinder have?
- A new type of curvature multivector for surfaces?
- A closed manifold of negative Ricci curvature has no conformal vector fields
- CAT(0) references request
- Why is $\kappa$ for a vertical line in 2-space not undefined?
- Discrete points curvature analysis
- Local computation of the curvature form of a line bundle
- Closed surface embedded in $\mathbb R^3$ with nonnegative Gaussian curvature at countable number of points
- What properties of a curve fail to hold when it is not regular?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
A sketch of the main ideas:
On a three dimensional pseudo-Riemannian manifold, the Riemann curvature tensor is entirely determined by the Ricci tensor.
First, the algebraic symmetries of the Riemann tensor implies that at a point it can be identified with a symmetric mapping from the space of antisymmetric two forms to itself via $$ \omega_{ab} \mapsto \mathrm{Riem}_{ab}{}^{cd} \omega_{cd}.$$ This means that the space of possible Riemann tensors is 6 dimensional.
The Ricci tensor is a symmetric two tensor; pointwise this means that it also has 6 dimensions of freedom.
Now, let $g_{ab}$ denote the metric tensor, and let $S_{ab}$ be a symmetric two tensor, and denote by $S = g_{ab} S^{ab}$ its trace. Consider the linear mapping $$ \Psi: S_{ab} \mapsto S_{ac} g_{bd} + S_{bd} g_{ac} - S_{ad} g_{bc} - S_{bc} g_{ad} - \frac12 S (g_{ac}g_{bd} - g_{ad} g_{bc}) $$ One checks that the output is an "algebraic Riemann tensor", meaning that it satisfies all the algebraic symmetries to quality it as a Riemann tensor. Giving an algebraic Riemann tensor, the mapping $T: R_{abcd} \mapsto g^{ac} R_{abcd}$ outputs a symmetric two tensor. It is a simple computation to check that $$ \Psi \circ T = \mathrm{Id}, T \circ \Psi = \mathrm{Id} $$ Since the space of algebraic Riemann tensor and that of Ricci tensors have the same number of dimension (with the manifold dimension = 3), this means that every Riemann tensor is uniquely determined (rank-nullity theorem) by its Ricci tensor via the mapping $\Psi$.
Using the mapping $\Psi$, it is simple to check that since we already know that the for our Einstein manifold $\mathrm{Ric}_{ab} = \Lambda g_{ab}$, and $R = 3 \Lambda$, we conclude $$ \mathrm{Riem}_{abcd} =\frac12 \Lambda (g_{ac}g_{bd} - g_{ad}g_{bc}) $$ and therefore the manifold has constant sectional curvature.
Remark: the construction used in writing down the mapping $\Psi$ is the Kulkarni-Nomizu product.