We define the domain (a connected open set) to be the complex plane minus the logarithmic spiral:
- $D = \mathbb{C} \setminus \{te^{it} : t \ge 0 \} $.
I need to find a branch $ F(z) $ of the complex logarithm $ \log(z) $ in $ D $ which satsfies $ F(1) = 0 $.
Now, my problem is that we cannot use a standard branch which takes off a ray in some direction starting from the origin, so I don't even know how to start thinking of a branch, let alone proving it is analytic afterwards.
I'd like to get some help, thank you in advance.

Define $$\phi_\pm : \mathbb C \to \mathbb C, \phi(z) = z e^{\pm i \lvert z \rvert}.$$ These maps are continuous and it is easy to verify that $\phi_- \circ \phi_+ = id$ and $\phi_+ \circ \phi_- = id$. Thus $\phi_\pm$ are homeomorphisms which are inverse to each other.
We have $$\phi_+([0,\infty)) = \{\phi_+(t) \mid t \in [0,\infty) \} = \{te^{it} \mid t \in [0,\infty) \}$$ and therefore $$\phi_+(\mathbb C \setminus [0,\infty)) = D .$$ This shows that $\phi_+$ maps the sliced plane $P = \mathbb C \setminus [0,\infty)$ homeomorphically onto $D$. Hence $D$ is simply connected which is sufficient to conclude that there exists a branch of the logarithm $\ln_D$ on $D$ such that $\ln_D(1) = 0$. Simply take $\ln_D(z) = \int_\gamma \frac 1 \zeta d\zeta$, where $\gamma$ is any curve from $1$ to $z$.
Update:
The essential ingredient in the above argument is that each holomorphic $g : U \to \mathbb C$ on a simply connected domain $U$ has an antiderivative $G : U \to \mathbb C$. Explicitly we can take $G(z) = \int_\gamma g(\zeta)d\zeta$ where $\gamma$ is any curve from a fixed $z_0 \in U$ to $z \in U$. This $G$ has the property $G(z_0) = 0$.
In the above situation this is applied to $g(z) = \frac 1 z$ and $z_0 = 1$. But why is the resulting antiderivative $\ln_D : D \to \mathbb C$ a branch of the logarìthm?
Let us consider a domain $U \subset \mathbb C^* = \mathbb C \setminus \{0\}$. A holomorphic function $\ell : U \to \mathbb C$ is called a branch of the logarithm on $U$ if $e^{\ell(z)} = z$ for all $z \in U$. The chain rule shows that $e^{\ell(z)} \ell'(z) = 1$ which gives $\ell'(z) = \frac 1 z$. Thus each branch of the logarithm on $U$ is an antiderivative of $\frac 1 z$.
Given a domain $U \subset \mathbb C^*$ it is not obvious (i) that $\frac 1 z$ has an antiderivative on $U$, and (ii) if such an antiderivative exists, that it is a branch of the logarithm on $U$.
A sufficient condition for the existence is that $U$ is simply connected. Even in that case not every antiderivative $\ell$ will be a branch of the logarithm on $U$. In fact, fixing an antiderivative $\ell_0$, the collection of all antiderivatives is given by the functions $\ell_c : U \to \mathbb C, \ell_c(z) = \ell_0(z) + c$, with $c \in \mathbb C$. We then get $$e^{\ell_c(z)} = e^{\ell_0(z)}e^c \tag{1}$$ which can certainly not be a branch of the logarithm for all $c$. A minimal requirement for $\ell_c$ to be a branch of the logarithm is that $e^{\ell_c(z_0)} = z_0$ for some $z_0 \in U$. This means $$e^c = \frac{z_0}{e^{\ell_0(z_0)}} . \tag{2}$$ Such $c$ always exists because the exponential function $\exp(z) = e^z$ has image $\mathbb C^*$. Thus there always exists an antiderivative $\ell$ such that $e^{\ell(z_0)} = z_0$. But now we have
Lemma. Let $\ell : U \to \mathbb C$ be an antiderivative on $\frac 1 z$ on $U$ such that $e^{\ell(z_0)} = z_0$ for some $z_0 \in U$. Then $\ell$ is a branch of the logarithm on $U$.
Proof. Consider the function $\phi : U \to \mathbb C, \phi(z) = \frac{e^{\ell(z)}}{z}$. We have $$\phi'(z) = \frac{e^{\ell(z)}\frac 1 z z - e^{\ell(z)}}{z^2} = 0 .$$
Thus $\phi$ is constant. This proves the Lemma because $\phi(z_0) = 1$.