I am reading “Fourier-Mukai transforms in algebraic geometry” by Daniel Huybrecht. On page 130 it is written that by Hodge theory there is a natural direct sum decomposition $$H^n(X,\mathbb{C})=\bigoplus_{p+q=n}H^{p,q}$$ with $\overline{H^{p,q}}=H^{q,p}$ and moreover $H^{p,q}\cong H^q(X, \Omega^p)$ where here $X$ is the analytification of a smooth projective variety over $\mathbb{C}$. I am agree that by Hodge decomposition, we have this for a compact Kähler manifold. So, if the analytification of a smooth projective variety over $\mathbb{C}$ is a compact Kähler manifold, we should have this decomposition. My question is that is this true and if not why do we have this decomposition?
2026-03-26 16:09:48.1774541388
Analytification of a smooth projective variety is a compact Kähler manifold.
277 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ALGEBRAIC-GEOMETRY
- How to see line bundle on $\mathbb P^1$ intuitively?
- Jacobson radical = nilradical iff every open set of $\text{Spec}A$ contains a closed point.
- Is $ X \to \mathrm{CH}^i (X) $ covariant or contravariant?
- An irreducible $k$-scheme of finite type is "geometrically equidimensional".
- Global section of line bundle of degree 0
- Is there a variant of the implicit function theorem covering a branch of a curve around a singular point?
- Singular points of a curve
- Find Canonical equation of a Hyperbola
- Picard group of a fibration
- Finding a quartic with some prescribed multiplicities
Related Questions in KAHLER-MANIFOLDS
- Relation between Fubini-Study metric and curvature
- Inequivalent holomorphic atlases
- Kaehler Potential Convexity
- Equality of $C^\infty$-functions on a complex manifold
- A compact Kähler manifold X with $H^{1,1}(X; \mathbb Z)=0$ cannot be embedded in a projective space?
- Picard group of a Torus
- à la Shafarevich conjecture for the moduli space of Calabi-Yau manifolds
- Difference of cohomologous Kähler forms
- What are the challenges and the importance to build an explicit K3 metric?
- Relative Hitchin-Kobayashi correspondence and relative Hermitian Yang-Mills connections
Related Questions in HODGE-THEORY
- How are rational algebraic Hodge classes of type $ (p,p) $ defined?
- Why $H_{dR}^1(M) \simeq \mathbb R^n$ when $H_1(M,\mathbb Z)$ has $n$ generators?
- Regarding Hodge's theorem
- Let $M$ is compact Riemann surface, if $\omega$ is a 2-form and $\int_{M} \omega =0$ then there exists a smooth function $f$ such that $\omega=d*df$
- Commutation of the covariant Hodge Laplacian with the covariant derivative
- Every $L^2$ function is the divergence of a $L^2$ vector field
- Question in proof of Hodge decomposition theorem
- Lefschetz (1,1) theorem for quasi-projective varieties
- Local invariant cycles with integer coefficients
- Sign of codifferential
Related Questions in PROJECTIVE-VARIETIES
- Degree of images of projective varieties
- Smoothness of an algebraic subvariety
- Why can a projective variety of dimension $n$ be covered by $n+1$ affine open subsets?
- Showing the join of two disjoint projective varieties is a projective variety.
- Image of the Segre embedding of an hypersurface
- Is the Zariski topology on a variety $V$ a maximal Noetherian topology?
- Shafarevich, locally regular $\Rightarrow$ globally regular
- Differential 1-forms on an irreducible projective variety
- Intersection number for projective plane curves
- Degree and codimension of nondegenerate varieties
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Yes, this boils down to two facts, which you should be able to find in e.g. Huybrecht's Complex Geometry or Voisin's Hodge Theory and Complex Algebraic Geometry: I.
$\mathbb{P}^n(\mathbb{C})$ is a Kähler manifold. This is true, since we can endow it with the Fubini-Study metric.
If $M$ is a Kähler manifold and $N\subset M$ is a complex submanifold, then $(N,\omega|_N)$ is Kähler, where $\omega$ is the Kähler form of $M$.
Now every smooth projective variety $X$ over $\mathbb{C}$ admits a closed embedding $X\hookrightarrow \mathbb{P}^n$ (as schemes over $\mathbb{C}$). Applying the analytification functor realizes $X(\mathbb{C})$ as a complex submanifold of $\mathbb{P}^n(\mathbb{C})$ and combining the two above facts you are done.