By generalizing methods used in An integral involving a Gaussian and a logarithm. I have computed the following integral below: \begin{eqnarray} \tilde{\mathcal I}(A) &:=& \int\limits_{-1/A}^\infty \log(1+A \xi) \frac{e^{-\xi^2/2}}{\sqrt{2\pi}} d\xi \\ &=& \frac{1}{2} \log(\sqrt{2} A)+\frac{1}{4} \psi(1/2) + \frac{1}{4 A^2} F_{2,2}\left[\begin{array}{rr} 1 & 1 \\ 3/2 & 2\end{array};-\frac{1}{2 A^2}\right] + \frac{\log(\sqrt{2} A)-\gamma/2}{A \sqrt{2 \pi}} F_{1,1}\left[\begin{array}{r} 1/2 \\ 3/2 \end{array};-\frac{1}{2 A^2}\right] -1/2 \frac{1}{A \sqrt{2\pi}} F_{1,1}^{(1,0,0)}\left[\begin{array}{r} 1/2 \\ 3/2\end{array};-\frac{1}{2 A^2}\right] \end{eqnarray} Here $\psi$ denotes the di-gamma function and $F_{1,1}^{(1,0,0)}$ is the derivative of the hypergeometric function with respect to its first parameter. Clearly $\tilde{\mathcal I}(A) \simeq -A^2/2$ as $A \rightarrow 0_+$ and $\tilde{\mathcal I}(A) \simeq 1/2 \log(A)$ as $A \rightarrow \infty$.
The quantity $\tilde{\mathcal I}(A)$ along with the real part of the quantity ${\mathcal I}(A)$ are plotted below in Red and in Blue respectively.

Now, again the question is how will the result look like is we replace the Gaussian by a Tsallis' or a L\'{e}vy stable density function ?
Here we provide an answer for the Tsallis' case only. Denoting the unknown integral by $\tilde{\mathcal I}_q$ we clearly have(see the answer to the other question for justification): \begin{equation} \tilde{\mathcal I}_q(A) = \frac{1}{\Gamma(\frac{1}{q-1}-\frac{1}{2})} \int\limits_0^\infty \frac{d s}{s} s^{\frac{1}{q-1}-\frac{1}{2}} e^{-s} \tilde{\mathcal I}\left(\frac{A}{\sqrt{s (q-1)}}\right) \end{equation} Therefore inserting the right hand side of the equation in the formulation of the question into the above equation and integrating term by term just the same way as we did in the answer to the old question we get: \begin{eqnarray} \tilde{\mathcal I}_q(A) = \frac{1}{2} \log(\sqrt{2} A)-\frac{1}{4}\left(\log(q-1) + \psi(\frac{1}{q-1}-\frac{1}{2})\right) +\frac{1}{4} \psi(\frac{1}{2})+ \frac{1}{4 A^2}\left(1-\frac{1}{2}(q-1)\right) F_{3,2}\left[\begin{array}{rrr} 1&1&\frac{1}{q-1}+\frac{1}{2}\\\frac{3}{2}&2\end{array};-\frac{(q-1)}{2 A^2}\right]+ \frac{{\mathcal A}_q}{A \sqrt{2 \pi}} (\log(A) -\frac{1}{2}(\log(q-1) + \psi(\frac{1}{q-1}))+(\log(\sqrt{2}) -\gamma/2))F_{2,1}\left[\begin{array}{rr}\frac{1}{2}& \frac{1}{q-1} \\ \frac{3}{2} \end{array};-\frac{(q-1)}{2 A^2}\right] - \frac{{\mathcal A}_q}{2 A \sqrt{2 \pi}} \left( \left. \partial_a F_{2,1}\left[\begin{array}{rr}a & \frac{1}{q-1} \\ \frac{3}{2} \end{array};-\frac{(q-1)}{2 A^2}\right] \right|_{a=1/2} + \left. \partial_a F_{2,1}\left[\begin{array}{rr}a & \frac{1}{2} \\ \frac{3}{2} \end{array};-\frac{(q-1)}{2 A^2}\right] \right|_{a=\frac{1}{q-1}} \right) \end{eqnarray} where \begin{equation} {\mathcal A}_q := \left( \frac{\sqrt{q-1}\Gamma(\frac{1}{q-1})}{\Gamma(\frac{1}{q-1}-\frac{1}{2})}\right) \end{equation} As we can see the result has a nice symmetry; see the last two terms for example. This symmetry was not visible in the Gaussian case. It is usually the case that there is a need to generalize results because the generalized results are more symmetric than the simple ones. In other words the beauty reveals itself after an appropriate generalization only. Since ${\mathcal A}_q \rightarrow 1$ when $q\rightarrow 1_+$ and $(\log(q-1) + \psi(\frac{1}{q-1})) \rightarrow 0$ when $q\rightarrow 1_+$ we clearly see that $\tilde{\mathcal I}_q \rightarrow \tilde{\mathcal I}$ when $q$ goes to unity.