For the past few days I've been studying analysis/metric spaces and right now I'm busy with Banach's theorem. I was making an old exam question which I have no clue how to begin solving it. It goes as follows: Using Banach's theorem we need to proof that there exists a unique bounded (and continuous) function $f: \mathbb{R} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ for which the following holds, $$\forall x \in \mathbb{R}: f(x) = \frac{1}{2+|f(x+1)|} +3cos(x)$$ I do not have any clue how to start with this problem, the only thing I did was come up with a condition for a fixed point since this is a crucial part of Banach's theorem. Does anyone know how to start with this problem, if so any help would be greatly appreciated :))
2026-03-30 06:45:33.1774853133
Application of Banach's theorem
90 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in REAL-ANALYSIS
- how is my proof on equinumerous sets
- Finding radius of convergence $\sum _{n=0}^{}(2+(-1)^n)^nz^n$
- Optimization - If the sum of objective functions are similar, will sum of argmax's be similar
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Justify an approximation of $\sum_{n=1}^\infty G_n/\binom{\frac{n}{2}+\frac{1}{2}}{\frac{n}{2}}$, where $G_n$ denotes the Gregory coefficients
- Calculating the radius of convergence for $\sum _{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\left(\sqrt{ n^2+n}-\sqrt{n^2+1}\right)^n}{n^2}z^n$
- Is this relating to continuous functions conjecture correct?
- What are the functions satisfying $f\left(2\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{3^i}\right)=\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{2^i}$
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- A particular exercise on convergence of recursive sequence
Related Questions in METRIC-SPACES
- Show that $d:\mathbb{C}\times\mathbb{C}\rightarrow[0,\infty[$ is a metric on $\mathbb{C}$.
- Question on minimizing the infimum distance of a point from a non compact set
- Is hedgehog of countable spininess separable space?
- Lemma 1.8.2 - Convex Bodies: The Brunn-Minkowski Theory
- Closure and Subsets of Normed Vector Spaces
- Is the following set open/closed/compact in the metric space?
- Triangle inequality for metric space where the metric is angles between vectors
- continuous surjective function from $n$-sphere to unit interval
- Show that $f$ with $f(\overline{x})=0$ is continuous for every $\overline{x}\in[0,1]$.
- Help in understanding proof of Heine-Borel Theorem from Simmons
Related Questions in FIXED-POINT-THEOREMS
- Newton's method with no real roots
- Determine $ \ a_{\max} \ $ and $ \ a_{\min} \ $ so that the above difference equation is well-defined.
- Banach and Caristi fixed point theorems
- Show that $\Phi$ is a contraction with a maximum norm.
- Using Fixed point iteration to find sum of a Serias
- Map a closed function $f: (1,4) \rightarrow (1,4)$ without fixed point
- Stop criterium for fixed point methods
- Approximate solutions to nonlinear differential equations using an integral sequence
- Inverse function theorem via degree theory
- Fixed point of a map $\mathbb R^n \rightarrow \mathbb R^n$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Let $B := B(\mathbb{R}, \mathbb{R})$ be the space of bounded functions equipped with the sup norm, and let $\mathcal{C_b} := \mathcal{C}_b(\mathbb{R}, \mathbb{R})$ be the space of continuous bounded functions equipped with the sup norm as well.
Consider then $T_1 : B \to B$ and $T_2 : \mathcal{C}_b \to \mathcal{C}_b$ defined by: $$T_k(f) = \left(x \mapsto \frac{1}{2 + |f(x+1)|} + 3\cos x\right)$$ for $f$ in the respective domains of $T_1$ or $T_2$.
Both $B$ and $\mathcal{C_b}$ are complete w.r.t. their norm. Moreover, due to the continuity and boundedness of $\cos$, as well as the fact that $0 \leq \frac{1}{2 + |f(x+1)|} \leq \frac{1}{2}$ and that $t \mapsto \frac{1}{t}$ is continuous on $\{t \geq 2\}$, $T_1$ and $T_2$ are well-defined, so there only remains to check that they are contractions.
Let $(f,g) \in B^2$. Then, for all $x \in \mathbb{R}$ : $$\begin{split}\left|T_k(f)(x) - T_k(g)(x)\right| &= \left|\frac{1}{2 + |f(x+1)|} - \frac{1}{2 + |g(x+1)|}\right|\\ &= \frac{\Big||g(x+1) - |f(x+1)|\Big|}{(2 + |f(x+1)|)(2 + |g(x+1)|)}\\ &\leq \frac{|g(x+1) - f(x+1)|}{4}\\ &\leq \frac{{\|f - g\|}_\infty}{4}\end{split}$$ where the second-to-last step uses the second triangle inequality (or reverse triangle inequality? I do not remember how it's called in English) and the fact that the denominator is bigger than $(2 + 0)(2 + 0)= 4$.
Hence, taking the sup: $${\left\|T_k(f) - T_k(g)\right\|}_\infty \leq \frac{1}{4} {\|f - g\|}_\infty$$ Thus both $T_1$ and $T_2$ are contractions as $\frac{1}{4} < 1$, and satisfy the conditions of the Banach-Picard fixed point theorem, meaning that both of them admit respective unique fixed points $f_1 \in B$ and $f_2 \in \mathcal{C}_b$.
But since $\mathcal{C_b} \subset B$, $f_2$ is also a fixed point of $T_1$, hence by uniqueness $f_1 = f_2 =: f^*$, which means that $f^*$ is unique among all bounded functions, while being continuous.
You'll notice that any continuous bounded function could have replaced $3\cos$, as it did not play a role in determining whether $T_2$ was a contraction other than having these properties.