I am reading quotient space of topology and I am a little bit confused. I am looking at the relationship between $\mathbb{R},S^1$ and the quotient space $\mathbb{R}/{\sim}$, where the relation $\sim$ corresponds to the partition $\mathbb{R}=\mathbb{Z}\cup(\mathbb{R}-\mathbb{Z})$.
Function $f:\mathbb{R}\to S^1$ give by $f(t)=(\cos(2\pi t),\sin(2\pi t))$ is continuous, onto but not one-to-one. We can also define function $g:\mathbb{R}\to \mathbb{R}/{\sim}$ where $g(t)=[t]$.
The circle $S^1$ and the quotient space $\mathbb{R}/{\sim}$ is not the same mathematical object, I suppose. But intuitively speaking they should be the "same thing". So there should be some relationship (bijective function, I guess) between these two spaces. But I was considering the function $\pi\circ f^{-1}$ and it's not injective. Maybe I should define the equivalence relation in a different way? Like "$x\sim y$ if $x\equiv y\pmod {2\pi}$" Also, suppose we can find such a function, can it be a homeomorphism?
The relation is not given by that partition. As said in the comments, the relation is:
$x \sim y \iff x=y \mod 2\pi$
Now, consider the following map:
$f: \mathbb{R} \rightarrow S^1$; $x \mapsto e^{i x}$
Since it takes equivalents to the same image, the induced map:
$\tilde{f}: \mathbb{R} /{\sim} \rightarrow S^1$
is continuous.
Now, take the map $g: S^1 \rightarrow \mathbb{R}/{\sim}$; $e^{ix} \mapsto [x]$. It is obviously well defined, and easily seen to be continuous. Note that $g$ is the inverse of $f$. Therefore, the spaces are homeomorphic.