Let $\Omega \subseteq \mathbb{R}^n$ open and $f \in BV(\Omega) \cap C^{\infty}(\Omega)$. Now I would like to prove that $f \in W_1^1(\Omega)$. I know that the distributional derivates of $f$ are the classical derivates, but I don't find a way to show that $\partial_if \in L_1(\Omega)$ for $i=1,...,n$. Can maybe someone help me? :)
2026-03-25 23:37:22.1774481842
Are smooth bounded-variation functions in the Sobolev Space $W_{1,1}$?
431 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in BOUNDED-VARIATION
- Method for evaluating Darboux integrals by a sequence of partitions?
- Function of bounded variation which is differentiable except on countable set
- Variation with respect to the projective tensor norm of a matrix of bounded variation functions
- Associativity of an integral against a function with finite variation
- Suppose $f(x)$ is of bounded variation. Show $F(x) = \frac{1}{x} \int_0^x f(t) \, dt$ is also of bounded variation.
- Is there a sufficient condition for which derivative of $\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} a_n x^n$ is bounded for all $x \in \mathbb{R}$?
- Looking for the name of this property, if it has one.
- Bounded Variation Proof
- Rearranging a sequence of bounded variation
- If $f$ is $g$-Riemann-Stieltjes integrable on $[a,b]$, prove that it's $g$-RS-integrable on $[a,c] \subset [a,b]$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
EDIT. In 2019 I left unfinished this answer. In 2020, just after Christmas I answered a related question, and today, after a few months of lock down, I decided to finish it by using the same method employed for the latter answer, just for the sake of completeness, and in the hope that this will be useful for someone.
In order to correctly answer the question, let's state explicitly the two definitions lying at the roots of the theory of BV functions (see for example [1], chapter 1, pp. 3-4):
Definition 1. Let $\Omega\subseteq \Bbb R^n$ be an open set and let $f\in L^1(\Omega)$. The total variation of f (in $\Omega$) is the following non negative quantity $$\DeclareMathOperator{\grd}{\operatorname{grad}} \DeclareMathOperator{\dvg}{\operatorname{div}} \DeclareMathOperator{\supp}{\mathrm{supp}} V(f,\Omega)=\sup\Bigg\{\int\limits_\Omega\! f(x)\dvg{\mathbf{g}(x)}\,\mathrm{d}x\,\Big|\,\mathbf{g}=(g_1,\ldots,g_n)\in C_0^1(\Omega,\Bbb R^n),\;|\mathbf{g}(x)|\le1\,\forall x\in\Omega\Bigg\} $$
Definition 2. A function $f\in L^1(\Omega)$ is said to have bounded variation if $V(f,\Omega)<\infty$. $BV(\Omega)$ is defined as the space of all functions in $L^1(\Omega)$ of bounded variation.
Now consider $f\in BV(\Omega)\cap C^1(\Omega)$: then, for every $\mathbf{g}(x) \in C_0^1(\Omega,\Bbb R^n)$ such that $\;|\mathbf{g}(x)|\le1$ on $\Omega$, we have that $$ \begin{split} \int\limits_\Omega\! f(x)\dvg{\mathbf{g}(x)}\,\mathrm{d}x &= - \int\limits_\Omega \sum_{i=1}^n \frac{\partial f(x)}{\partial x_i}\cdot{ g_i(x)}\,\mathrm{d}x\\ &= -\int\limits_\Omega\langle\grd f(x),{\mathbf{g}(x)}\rangle\,\mathrm{d}x.\\ \end{split}\label{1}\tag{1} $$ A first consequence of this formula is the following result, obtained by using the Cauchy-Schwartz inequality, $$ \begin{split} -\langle\grd\!f(x) ,{\mathbf{g}(x)}\rangle &\le |\langle\grd\!f(x) ,{\mathbf{g}(x)}\rangle| \\ & = \left| \sum_{i=1}^n \frac{\partial f(x)}{\partial x_i}\cdot{ g_i(x)}\right|\\ &\le \left( \sum_{i=1}^n \left|\frac{\partial f(x)}{\partial x_i}\right|^2\right)^\frac{1}{2}\left( \sum_{i=1}^n g_i(x)^2\right)^\frac{1}{2} \\ \\ & = \vert\grd\!f(x)\vert|\mathbf{g}(x)|\le\vert\grd\!f(x)\vert \end{split} $$ which in turn implies $$ -\int\limits_{\supp\mathbf{g}}\langle\grd\!f(x),{\mathbf{g}(x)}\rangle\,\mathrm{d}x\le \int\limits_{\supp\mathbf{g}}\vert\grd\!f(x)\vert\,\mathrm{d}x \label{2}\tag{2} $$
Define the positive and negative parts of the components of $\grd f$ as $$ \partial_i f^+(x)= \begin{cases} \dfrac{\partial f(x)}{\partial x_i} & \dfrac{\partial f(x)}{\partial x_i}> 0\\ 0 & \dfrac{\partial f(x)}{\partial x_i}\le 0 \end{cases}\qquad \partial_if^-(x)= \begin{cases} 0 & \dfrac{\partial f(x)}{\partial x_i}\ge 0\\ -\dfrac{\partial f(x)}{\partial x_i} & \dfrac{\partial f(x)}{\partial x_i}< 0 \end{cases}\\ \forall x\in\Bbb R^n,\: i=1, \ldots, n, $$ and their support sets as $$\DeclareMathOperator{\intr}{\operatorname{int}} \DeclareMathOperator{\closr}{\operatorname{clo}} \begin{align} \Omega^+_i & \triangleq \intr\closr\Big\{x\in\Omega : \tfrac{\partial f(x)}{\partial x_i} > 0\Big\} \\ \Omega^-_i & \triangleq \intr\closr\Big\{x\in\Omega : \tfrac{\partial f(x)}{\partial x_i} < 0\Big\} \end{align} \qquad i=1, \ldots, n. $$ where $\closr$ and $\intr$ are respectively the closure and the interior operators. Then, from \eqref{1}, we have $$ -\int\limits_{\Omega} \langle\grd f(x) , \mathbf{g}(x) \rangle \mathrm{d}x = \sum_{i=1}^n \Bigg[\,\int\limits_{\Omega} \partial_i f^-(x) g_i(x)\, \mathrm{d}x - \int\limits_{\Omega} \partial_if^+(x) g_i(x) \, \mathrm{d}x \Bigg]\qquad\forall \mathbf g\in C^{1}_0(\Omega,\mathbb{R}^n). $$ Since the sets $\Omega_i^\pm$ are open and non empty (at least not for all $i$) and thus contain non empty compact subsetsets $K_i^\pm$, $i=1, \ldots, n$, for each of them, by using partitions of unity, it is possible construct a compactly supported family of functions ${\varphi}^\pm_i(x)\in C^\infty_0(\Omega,\mathbb{R})$ in such a way that $$ \begin{split} 0\le\varphi^\pm_i &(x) \le 1\quad \forall x\in \Omega^\pm_i\\ \varphi^\pm_i &(x) = 1 \quad \forall x\in K^\pm_i\\ &\supp \varphi^\pm_i \Subset \Omega^\pm_i \end{split}\label{3}\tag{K} $$ By defining $\varphi_i(x)=\varphi_i^-(x)-\varphi^+_i(x)$ and $\boldsymbol{\varphi}(x)= \big(\varphi_1(x), \ldots, \varphi_n(x)\big)$ we have $$ -\int\limits_{\Omega} \langle \grd f(x) , \boldsymbol{\varphi}(x) \rangle \mathrm{d}x = \sum_{i=1}^n \Bigg[\,\int\limits_{\Omega} g^+_i(x) \varphi_i^+(x)\, \mathrm{d}x + \int\limits_{\Omega} g^-_i(x) \varphi_i^-(x) \, \mathrm{d}x \Bigg], $$ and then $$ \begin{split} V(f,\Omega) & \ge \sup_{\boldsymbol{\varphi}(x)\in K_0(\Omega, \Bbb R^n)} \sum_{i=1}^n \Bigg[\,\int\limits_{\Omega} \partial_i f^+(x) \varphi_i^+(x)\, \mathrm{d}x + \int\limits_{\Omega} \partial_i f^-(x) \varphi_i^-(x) \, \mathrm{d}x \Bigg]\\ & = \sum_{i=1}^n \int\limits_{\Omega} \bigg|\frac{\partial f(x)}{\partial x_i}\bigg| \, \mathrm{d}x \ge \int\limits_{\Omega} |\grd f(x)| \, \mathrm{d}x \ge 0. \end{split} $$ where $K_0(\Omega, \Bbb R^n)\subsetneq C^1_0(\Omega, \Bbb R^n)$ is the set of compactly supported functions constructed by using relations \eqref{3}. This inequality, since $f\in BV(\Omega)$, implies $$ \int\limits_\Omega\vert\operatorname{grad}\!f(x)\vert\,\mathrm{d}x<\infty\iff \operatorname{grad}\!f(x)\in L^1(\Omega,\Bbb R^n) $$ Having proved the $L^1$ integrability of the gradient of $f$, by applying \eqref{2} we have that $$ \begin{split} \int\limits_\Omega\vert\operatorname{grad}\!f(x)\vert\,\mathrm{d}x & \ge \sup\Bigg\{ \int\limits_{\supp\mathbf{g}}\vert\grd\!f(x)\vert\,\mathrm{d}x \,\Big|\,\mathbf{g}\in C_0^1(\Omega,\Bbb R^n),\;|\mathbf{g}(x)|\le1\,\forall x\in\Omega \Bigg\} \\ &\ge \sup\Bigg\{\!\!-\!\!\int\limits_{\supp\mathbf{g}}\langle\grd\!f(x),{\mathbf{g}(x)}\rangle\,\mathrm{d}x \,\Big|\,\mathbf{g}\in C_0^1(\Omega,\Bbb R^n),\;|\mathbf{g}(x)|\le1\,\forall x\in\Omega\Bigg\} =V(f,\Omega) \end{split} $$ and thus $$ V(f,\Omega)=\int\limits_\Omega\vert\grd f(x)\vert\,\mathrm{d}x\iff f\in W^{1,1}(\Omega) $$ The reasoning is exactly the same if we consider $f\in BV(\Omega)\cap C^\infty(\Omega)$.
Notes
As stated above, this answer closely follows this one: the only point of departure is possibly the use of the inequality $$ \sum_{i=1}^n \int\limits_{\Omega} \bigg|\frac{\partial f(x)}{\partial x_i}\bigg| \, \mathrm{d}x \ge \int\limits_{\Omega} |\grd f(x)| \, \mathrm{d}x $$
Reference.
[1] Enrico Giusti (1984), Minimal surfaces and functions of bounded variations, Monographs in Mathematics, 80, Basel–Boston–Stuttgart: Birkhäuser Verlag, pp. XII+240, ISBN 978-0-8176-3153-6, MR 0775682, Zbl 0545.49018