Are there irreducible polynomials that are partially solvable by radicals?

730 Views Asked by At

In general, polynomials of degree 5 or higher, with rational coefficients, are not solvable by radicals. There are some exceptions and trivial cases, for example $x^5-5x+12$ and $x^{100}+x^{25}+3$, respectively.

All irreducible polynomials with rational coefficients, that I am aware of, have either none or all roots that can be expressed by radicals.

Do partially-solvable irreducible polynomials exist? If they do, are there any examples known?

I mean, for example, an irreducible polynomial of $n$th degree that can be split over $Q(\sqrt{2})$ into two polynomials of 3rd and $(n-3)$th degrees, where the polynomial of $(n-3)$th is not solvable by radicals.


At https://math.stackexchange.com/q/662972 Alexander Gruber wrote:

Polynomials which are not solvable by radicals have (at least one) root that cannot be written by any combination of the operations of addition, multiplication, and the taking of nth roots.

I am not sure if he meant only reducible polynomials, and/or with non-rational coefficients, as polynomials that have "at least one" root that cannot be expressed by radicals.

1

There are 1 best solutions below

2
On BEST ANSWER

If you allow complex radicals (such as roots of unity), then the answer is no. This follows from the following:

Proposition. The normal closure of a finite radical extension is a radical extension.

Proof. Let $ L/K $ be a radical extension, and induct on the degree $ n = [L : K] $. For $ n = 1 $ the claim is obvious. Pick a proper subfield $ L' $ of $ L $ such that $ L = L'(\alpha) $ for some $ \alpha \in L $ such that $ \alpha^k \in L' $ for some $ k > 1 $, such a subfield exists since $ n > 1 $ and $ L/K $ is a radical extension. Then, the normal closure of $ L/K $ is $ N/K $, where $ N $ is the compositum of the splitting field of the minimal polynomial of $ \alpha $ over $ K $, and the normal closure $ N'/K $ of $ L'/K $. The extension $ N'/K $ is a radical extension by induction hypothesis, and since being radical is transitive, we are done if we prove that $ N/N' $ is a radical extension.

$ N $ is generated over $ N' $ by the $ K $-conjugates of $ \alpha $. Let $ a = \alpha^k \in N' $, and take $ \sigma \in \textrm{Aut}(N/K) $. Any conjugate of $ \alpha $ is $ \sigma(\alpha) $ for some $ \sigma $, and we have $ \sigma(a) = \sigma(\alpha^k) = \sigma(\alpha)^k $, where $ \sigma(a) $ is a conjugate of $ a $, and thus $ \sigma(a) \in N' $ by normality of $ N'/K $. Thus, every conjugate of $ \alpha $ is a root of some element of $ N' $, and since $ N $ is generated over $ N' $ by these conjugates, $ N/N' $ is a radical extension, and we are done.

To conclude, let $ L/K $ be any extension which is contained in a radical extension $ M/K $. Then, the normal closure of $ L/K $ is contained in the normal closure of $ M/K $, and the latter is a radical extension by the proposition. Thus, the normal closure of $ L/K $ is also contained in a radical extension of $ K $. Now, note that if $ L = K(\alpha) $ where $ \alpha $ has minimal polynomial $ p \in K[X] $, then the normal closure is the splitting field of $ p $, and thus contains every root of $ p $.