This might be very basic but... Take any number for example 2356 now 2+3+5+6=16 and 1+6=7 or 236+5=241 and 2+4+1=7 and also 21+4=25 again 2+5=7 or 652+3=655 which digits sum is 7 again and then 65+5=70 again 7 or 56+5=61 again 7 And so on make any number out of 2356 it will always end up in 7 when digits are added. Similar is true for any other number however big or small. just wondering why?
2026-04-01 14:09:41.1775052581
Basic Maths...can’t get my head around this.
49 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in SUMMATION
- Computing:$\sum_{n=0}^\infty\frac{3^n}{n!(n+3)}$
- Prove that $1+{1\over 1+{1\over 1+{1\over 1+{1\over 1+...}}}}=\sqrt{1+\sqrt{1+\sqrt{1+\sqrt{1+...}}}}$
- Fourier series. Find the sum $\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{(-1)^{n+1}}{2n+1}$
- Sigma (sum) Problem
- How to prove the inequality $\frac{1}{n}+\frac{1}{n+1}+\cdots+\frac{1}{2n-1}\geq \log (2)$?
- Double-exponential sum (maybe it telescopes?)
- Simplify $\prod_{k=1}^{l} \sum_{r=d}^m {{m}\choose{r}} \left(N-k \right)^{r} k^{m-r+1}$
- Sum of two martingales
- How can we prove that $e^{-jωn}$ converges at $0$ while n -> infinity?
- Interesting inequalities
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
What you appear to be noticing is a result of the following:
Any integer $n$ has the same remainder when divided by nine as the remainder that the sum of the digits has when divided by nine. Similarly so, by repeating the process you get that any integer $n$ has the same remainder when divided by nine as the sum of the sum of the sum of the digits, repeated as many times as is necessary to arrive at a one digit number.
This is an efficient way to check to see if something is a multiple of three, for example $12345654321\mapsto 1+2+3+4+5+6+5+4+3+2+1 = 36\mapsto 9$ so indeed $12345654321$ has a sum of sum of digits equal to $9$ so it is a multiple of nine and therefore also a multiple of $3$.
In your specific observation, you are taking a number, for example $2356$ and adding the digits repeatedly until arriving at a one digit number, in this case $7$. You get the same result whether you added the digits individually, or whether you added them concatenated as in $23+56$ and then repeating the process., this again is because the concatenations of the numbers still have the same remainders when divided by nine as the sum of the digits themselves.