I was reading an example of the application of the Argument Principle and I encountered the following reasoning, which I do not understand.
At a certain point in the example, we consider $f(iy)=(y^4 − 4y^2 + 3)+i(-y^3+2y)$ and the following asseveration is made: since $\lim_{y\to \infty}\frac{-y^3+2y}{y^4 − 4y^2 + 3}=0$, then $f(iy)$ reaches the positive real axis as $y\to\infty$. (You can see the context of this reasoning on page 6 of this PDF http://legacy-www.math.harvard.edu/archive/115_fall_06/argument_principle.pdf).
I do not understand why this is true. I fact, I have ploted the curve (in this context $y$ takes values from $0$ to $\infty$), and it does not seem like it reaches the positive real axis as $y\to\infty$.
If anyone could clarify why this reasoning is valid it would be very helpful.
Thanks.
Not an answer
$(p=\text{Re }z=t^4-4 t^2+3,q=\text{Im }z=2 t-t^3)$
eliminating the parameter $t$ I got the cartesian equation of the curve $$-p^3+p^2-4 p q^2+5 p+q^4-4 q^2+3=0$$ that I used to get the plot in the image below.
If you manage to plot the curve for huge values of $q$ you will see that $\arg z\to 0$ as the limit says $$\lim_{y\to \infty}\frac{-y^3+2y}{y^4 − 4y^2 + 3}=0\to \arg z\to 0$$
$$...$$