My notes report the following assertion for the theorem:
Beppo Levi's Theorem: Let $E$ be a measurable set and $\{ f_n(x)\}$ a sequence of integrable functions on E, such that $\lim\limits_{n\to\infty} f_n(x) = f(x)$ (pointwise convergence) almost everywhere on E, and $f_n(x)\leq f(x)$. Then $f(x)$ is integrable on E and $\lim\limits_{n\to\infty} \int\limits_E f_n(x) = \int\limits_E f(x)$
Is this correct? Cause my book reports multiple versions of the theorem, but not this one.
First this theorem is wrong
Consider $E = \mathbb R$, $f=0$ and $f_n = -\chi_{[n,n+1]}$. Where $\chi_{[n,n+1]}$ is the indicator function of the interval $[n,n+1]$.
They satisfy the hypothesis, but the conclusion doesn't hold as
$$ -1 = \int_{\mathbb R} f_n \neq \int_{\mathbb R} f = 0$$ while $(f_n)$ converges pointwise to the always vanishing function $f$.
Second this would more related to dominated convergence theorem
See Dominated convergence theorem if the hypothesis would be correctly set.