Boundary operator $\partial_n$ equal to composition $i_* \circ \delta$

48 Views Asked by At

I know that for a CW-complex $X$ with skeletons $X^n, n \geq 0$, one can identify the cellular chain group $C_n^{\text{cell}}(X)$ with the singular homology group $H_n(X^n, X^{n - 1}).$

What I don't understand at the moment, is why the boundary operator $\partial_n: C_n^{\text{cell}}(X) \rightarrow C_{n - 1}^{\text{cell}}(X)$ is equal to the composition $$H_n(X^n, X^{n - 1}) \overset{\delta}{\longrightarrow} H_n(X^{n - 1}) \overset{i_*}{\longrightarrow} H_{n - 1}(X^{n - 1}, X^{n - 2}),$$ where $\delta$ is the connecting homomorphism and $i_*$ is the induced mapping of the inclusion $i: (X^{n - 1}, \varnothing) \hookrightarrow (X^{n - 1}, X^{n - 2}).$

To be honest, I find the definition of $\partial_n$ hard to work with, so I have trouble seeing why this holds. I looked if Hatcher's Algebraic Topology had a section about it, but I did not find anything (or I simply missed it). I would really appreciate some help!

1

There are 1 best solutions below

0
On

Hatcher has a whole chapter

2.2. Computations and Applications

where he defines the cellular chain complex (but does not explicitly give it a name). See p. 139. If we denote this chain complex by $C_*^{CW}$, then $C_n^{CW}(X) = H_n(X^n,X^{n-1})$ with boundaries $\partial_n$ as in your question.

I agree that this definition of $\partial_n$ is hard to work with. But let us be honest: The boundaries in the singular chain complex are defined in a very transparent way, but in general they are of no practical use for computing homology groups.

Hatcher identifies the groups $C_n^{CW}(X)$ with more "accessible" groups:

... since $H_n(X^n,X^{n−1})$ is free with basis in one-to-one correspondence with the $n$-cells of $X$, so one can think of elements of $H_n(X^n,X^{n−1})$ as linear combinations of $n$-cells of $X$.

Moroever, on p. 140 he establishes the Cellular Boundary Formula whi ch allows to compute the $\partial_n$ more explicitly. However, in many cases this will not be easy because one has to determine the degree of maps $S^{n-1} \to S^{n-1}$.