Question:
Prove that for every positive constant $C$ there exists an $\epsilon > 0$ such that any curve in $\mathbb{R}^{2}$ whose image has points at distance $\leq \epsilon$ from each point of the unit square $[0,1]^{2}$ must have length $\geq C$.
My problem:
I have difficulty in understanding the question
how can a point in the image of a curve have a distance $\leq \epsilon$ from all the points of the unit solid square? I assume that $\epsilon$ can be chosen as a small value.- Also, suppose the length of one curve is $C^{\prime}$, and we can find an $\epsilon$, then this $\epsilon$ holds for all $C > C^{\prime}$ for this particular curve. How could this curve have length $\geq C$? (this is also related to understanding "any" curve, that is, for any curve, we have a $C$, or for any $C$ we have all curves satisfying blablabla).
Any explanation to help me understand this problem? Thank you!
Edit:
Thank you @Robert Israel for making my first bullet clear. However, I am still puzzling about my second bullet. I re-state my second bullet as follows,
Prove that, given any curve in $\mathbb{R}^{2}$, for every positive constant $C$ there exists an $\epsilon > 0$ such that for every point from the unit square $[0,1]^{2}$ we can always find at least one point from the image of this curve at distance $\leq \epsilon$, then this curve must have length $\geq C$.
Does my statement have the same meaning as the problem does? If so, what does the $C$ do in the statement? It seems only the $\epsilon$ is related to the curve.
Regarding the example below. The curve has a length of 4.75, and we find an $\epsilon = 1/8$ to satisfy all the requirements, but since $C$ is irrelated to the $\epsilon$, I can claim the statement holds for arbitrary $C >0$, so the length of this curve should be arbitrarily large. A contradiction. Now I was wondering if there must be some places where I misunderstood the statement of the problem.
