Let $ a,b\in \mathbb R $, $ a < b $, and let $ F $ be a normed space (you can take $ F = \mathbb R^n $, if you want). For a function $ \kappa\colon [a,b]\to F $ define $$ L(\kappa) = \sup{\left\{\sum_{i = 0}^n{\lVert\kappa(t_i) - \kappa(t_{i - 1})\rVert} : \text{$ t_0,\dots,t_n\in [a,b] $, $ t_0 = a < \cdots < t_n = b $}\right\}}\text{,} $$ and call $ \kappa $ rectifiable if $ L(\kappa) < +\infty $.
I'm trying to show that, if $ \gamma\colon [a,b]\to F $ is a rectifiable function, then for any strictly increasing sequence $ (t_n)_{n\in \mathbb N} $ of points $ t_n\in [a,b] $, $$ L(\gamma{\restriction_{[t_0,t]}}) = \sum_{n = 0}^\infty L(\gamma{\restriction_{[t_{n - 1},t_n]}}) $$ where $ t $ is the limit of the sequence $ (t_n)_{n\in \mathbb N} $. I believe this fact more than my own existence, but so far I haven't succeeded.
It is easy to see that $$ L(\gamma{\restriction_{[t_0,t_N]}}) = \sum_{n = 0}^N L(\gamma{\restriction_{[t_{n - 1},t_n]}}) $$ for any $ N\in \mathbb N $, $ N\geqq 1 $, so maybe it is sufficient to show that $$ \lim_{N\to \infty}L(\gamma{\restriction_{[t_0,t_N]}}) = L(\gamma{\restriction_{[t_0,t]}})\text{.} $$ So I noticed that for $ N\in \mathbb N $ $$ \left\lvert L(\gamma{\restriction_{[t_0,t_N]}}) - L(\gamma{\restriction_{[t_0,t]}})\right\rvert = \left\lvert L(\gamma{\restriction_{[t_N,t]}})\right\rvert $$ but I don't know how much this can help.
I don't think it's true as stated. Consider $\gamma : [0,1] \to \Bbb{R}$ defined as $$\gamma(t) = \begin{cases} 0, &\text{ if }t \in [0,1\rangle,\\ 1, &\text{ if }t =1.\\ \end{cases}$$ Then $\gamma$ is rectifiable, moreover $L(\gamma) = 1$. Consider the strictly increasing sequence $t_n = 1 - \frac1{n+1}, n \in \Bbb{N}_0$. We have $t_n \to t = 1$ and notice that for all $n \in \Bbb{N}_0$ holds $$\gamma{\restriction_{[t_n,t_{n+1}]}} \equiv 0 \implies L(\gamma{\restriction_{[t_n,t_{n+1}]}}) = 0$$ and therefore $$L(\gamma{\restriction_{[t_0,t]}}) = L(\gamma) = 1 \ne 0 = \sum_{n=0}^\infty L(\gamma{\restriction_{[t_n,t_{n+1}]}}).$$
Now if you require $\gamma$ to be continuous, I would expect the answer to be yes.