Let $V$ be a vector space and let $B$ be a basis of $V$. Since every vector space has a zero vector and since every basis is linearly independent it can't contain the zero vector and therefore the basis can't be a vector space. So let's examine a new set $U=B\cup\{0\}$ and check if $U$ can be a vector space. First of all it's clear that $U$ need not be a vector space. Second, if it is a vector space then $V=U$ because $\text{Span}(U)=\text{Span}(B)=\text{Span}(V)$. Furthermore, we must have $|B|=1$ because if $|B|>1$ then there exist $v_1,v_2\in B$ such that $v_1+v_2\in V=U$ but $v_1+v_2\neq 0$ (because $v_1,v_2$ are linearly independent) therefore $v_1+v_2\in B$ and an element of the basis is a linear combination of vectors from the basis which is a contradiction. It's also clear that the field of the vector space $V$ is finite. With all the information we gathered we don't have many options. I think that the only sets that satisfy this problem are $V=\mathbb{Z_2}$ and $B=\{1\}$ over the field $\mathbb{Z_2}$. I'm not sure if this is true, or how to prove it.
2026-04-06 00:14:42.1775434482
Can a basis together with the zero vector form a vector space?
91 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LINEAR-ALGEBRA
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- Alternate basis for a subspace of $\mathcal P_3(\mathbb R)$?
- Why the derivative of $T(\gamma(s))$ is $T$ if this composition is not a linear transformation?
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Summation in subsets
- $C=AB-BA$. If $CA=AC$, then $C$ is not invertible.
- Basis of span in $R^4$
- Prove if A is regular skew symmetric, I+A is regular (with obstacles)
Related Questions in VECTOR-SPACES
- Alternate basis for a subspace of $\mathcal P_3(\mathbb R)$?
- Does curl vector influence the final destination of a particle?
- Closure and Subsets of Normed Vector Spaces
- Dimension of solution space of homogeneous differential equation, proof
- Linear Algebra and Vector spaces
- Is the professor wrong? Simple ODE question
- Finding subspaces with trivial intersection
- verifying V is a vector space
- Proving something is a vector space using pre-defined properties
- Subspace of vector spaces
Related Questions in FINITE-FIELDS
- Covering vector space over finite field by subspaces
- Reciprocal divisibility of equally valued polynomials over a field
- Solving overdetermined linear systems in GF(2)
- Proof of normal basis theorem for finite fields
- Field $\mathbb{Q}(\alpha)$ with $\alpha=\sqrt[3]7+2i$
- Subfield of a finite field with prime characteristic
- Rank of a Polynomial function over Finite Fields
- Finite fields of order 8 and isomorphism
- Finding bases to GF($2^m$) over GF($2$)
- How to arrange $p-1$ non-zero elements into $A$ groups of $B$ where $p$ is a prime number
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
It looks like you've mostly got it, there are just a few minor details missing.
First, I agree with your deduction that $B$ cannot contain more than 1 element. So we have two possibilities - either $B = \{v\}$ is a singleton, or $B = \{\}$ is empty.
If $B$ is empty, then $V = \{0\}$ which is the zero space aka the trivial space. In this instance, the underlying field can be absolutely anything and $\dim(V) = 0$.
If $B$ is non-empty, then as we've established it is a singleton set containing one vector, and as a result $V = \{0\} \cup \{v\} = \{0, v\}$. Since $V$ is a vector space, every vector has an additive inverse, so in other words there must exist $v' \in V$ such that $v + v' = 0$. The only possibilities are $v' = v$ and $v' = 0$. Having $v' = 0$ leads to the whole vector space collapsing under itself (since we get $v = v + 0 = v + v' = 0$), so clearly $v' = v$. You can then show that the underlying field must be (isomorphic to) $\mathbb{Z}_2$ just because that's the only way to have a vector field with only two distinct elements.