Context: this paper, the equation right at the top of page 7.
$\varphi_x^n$ is defined as $$2^{nd/2}\varphi(2^n(x-y)),$$
and on the first line of the proof of theorem 2.10 (page 6) it says $\varphi:\mathbb{R}^d\to \mathbb{R}$.
However, part of the equation at the top of page 7 reads
$$(\varphi_x^n)\varphi_x^n(y),$$ where $x\in \mathbb{Z}^d \subset \mathbb{R}^d$ and $y\in \mathbb{R}^d$.
How can this work? When we evaluate $\varphi_x^n(y),$ we end up with something that's in $\mathbb{R}$. How can we then feed this into $\varphi_x^n(y)$ again, when the latter's domain is $\mathbb{R}^d$?
If you read correctly, it's not $(\varphi^n_x)\varphi^n_x(y)$.
It's $(\Pi_xf(x))(\varphi^n_x)$ multiplied by $\varphi^n_x(y)$