I repeat the Peano Axioms:
Zero is a number.
If a is a number, the successor of a is a number.
zero is not the successor of a number.
Two numbers of which the successors are equal are themselves equal.
If a set S of numbers contains zero and also the successor of every number in S, then every number is in S.
Suppose to have two isomorph "copies" of the natural numbers $\mathbb{N}':=\{0',1',2'...\}$ and $\mathbb{N}'':=\{0'',1'',2''...\}$. Then the set $NUMBERS:=\mathbb{N}'\cup \mathbb{N}''$ with "Zero"$:=0'$ and the "natural" successor for each element in any of the two sets, seems to satisfy the axioms.
Yes, P5 is very strange now because, it says that when I start with a set which I know to contain at least $0'$ and every successor of the numbers in it, automatically contains $0''$ which is not a successor of any number.
If this way of reasoning is allowed we could also use a number of copies of $\mathbb{N}$ indicized by a continuous index so there will be TWO NOT ISOMORPHIC Peano sets.
Because this sounds very strange to me, It's possible that there is a problem in my argument. What do you think?
I'm not fully sure I understand your question, but perhaps you will find this argument enlightening: consider the set
$$\mathbb{N}' = \{0', s(0'), s(s(0')), \ldots\}$$
which contains $0'$ and all its successors. (This is the same $\mathbb{N}'$ you defined in the question.) Hopefully it is clear that $\mathbb{N}'$ contains the successor of every element in $\mathbb{N}'$:
$$\forall n\in\mathbb{N}'\ s(n)\in\mathbb{N}'$$
So axiom 5 applies to $\mathbb{N}'$, which tells us that $\mathbb{N}'$ contains all numbers, or in other words, axiom 5 tells us that if $n$ is a number, $n\in\mathbb{N}'$. That in turn means anything not in $\mathbb{N}'$ is not a number.
Now, if you want, you can postulate the existence of another object, like $0''$, and even a set $\mathbb{N}''$ of that object and its successors. But you cannot claim that $0''$ (or any of its successors) is a number (as defined in the Peano axioms) without contradicting the result of the preceding argument, and thus contradicting axiom 5.
You can construct sets which contain numbers and other things, like $\mathbb{N}'\cup\mathbb{N}''$. This set contains every number, because every number is in $\mathbb{N}'$ and by the definition of the union operation, anything in $\mathbb{N}'$ is in the union of $\mathbb{N}'$ and any other set. It also contains a bunch of other things which are not numbers, namely the objects in the set $\mathbb{N}''$. Nothing says that every object in the set $S$ referenced in axiom 5 must be a number.