Can an infinite set have a Top element? Can a set of any given transfinite Cardinality possess a Top element? Are there any examples of known sets that have top elements and are more than finite? I am pretty certain that this is possible but I have only heard finite cases talked about.
2026-03-25 18:56:18.1774464978
Can a Transfinite set of any given size possess a top element?
36 Views Asked by user244476 https://math.techqa.club/user/user244476/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ORDER-THEORY
- Some doubt about minimal antichain cover of poset.
- Partially ordered sets that has maximal element but no last element
- Ordered set and minimal element
- Order relation proof ...
- Lexicographical covering of boolean poset
- Every linearly-ordered real-parametrized family of asymptotic classes is nowhere dense?
- Is there a name for this property on a binary relation?
- Is the forgetful functor from $\mathbf{Poset}$ to $\mathbf{Set}$ represented by the object 2?
- Comparing orders induced by euclidean function and divisibility in euclidean domain
- Embedding from Rational Numbers to Ordered Field is Order Preserving
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Yes. Every set can be linearly ordered, assuming the axiom of choice, and given any linear order $(X,\leq)$, we can pick one $x\in X$ and define $\leq_x$ which is $\leq$ on $X\setminus\{x\}$, and $y\leq_x x$ for all $y\in X$.
Since assuming choice gives you that every set can also be well-ordered, you can require that $\leq$ (and consequently $\leq_x$) is a well-order as well, which means that every non-empty set has a minimum too.
Another approach here is a model theoretic approach: let $T$ be the theory in the language of $\leq$ stating that $\leq$ is a linear ordering with a maximum. It is certainly consistent, and it has models of every finite size, therefore, by the compactness theorem, it has an infinite model, and therefore, by the Löwenheim–Skolem theorem, an infinite model of any given size.