I've heard of this and most roots are irrational such as $\sqrt{8}$ and $\sqrt[3]{25}$. So, can any of these roots be rational? I think so as I'm typing this. I think these are rational: $\sqrt[4]{256}$ and $\sqrt{144}$. I know that a rational number can be written as two fractions. Do the last two simplify to get a number that can be written as fractions? I think so. I think the third one simplifies to $4$ and the fourth one simplifies to $12$, while I think the first one simplifies to about 2.83 rounded to the nearest hundredth. Am I on the serious right track? I really hope this is a good train track that I'm standing on right here as I'm typing this.
2026-03-25 12:46:19.1774442779
Can any root, such as a square root or a cube root, be rational?
684 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ELEMENTARY-NUMBER-THEORY
- Maximum number of guaranteed coins to get in a "30 coins in 3 boxes" puzzle
- Interesting number theoretical game
- How do I show that if $\boldsymbol{a_1 a_2 a_3\cdots a_n \mid k}$ then each variable divides $\boldsymbol k $?
- Using only the digits 2,3,9, how many six-digit numbers can be formed which are divisible by 6?
- Algebra Proof including relative primes.
- How do I show that any natural number of this expression is a natural linear combination?
- Counting the number of solutions of the congruence $x^k\equiv h$ (mod q)
- algebraic integers of $x^4 -10x^2 +1$
- What exactly is the definition of Carmichael numbers?
- Number of divisors 888,888.
Related Questions in RADICALS
- Tan of difference of two angles given as sum of sines and cosines
- Symmetric polynomial written in elementary polynomials
- Interesting inequalities
- Prove that $\frac{1}{\sqrt{ab+a+2}}+ \frac{1}{\sqrt{bc+b+2}}+ \frac{1}{\sqrt{ac+c+2}} \leq \frac{3}{2}$
- Radical of Der(L) where L is a Lie Algebra
- Find local extrema $f(x_1,x_2, \ldots , x_n) = \sqrt{(x_1+x_2+\ldots x_n-a)(a-x_1)(a-x_2)\cdots (a-x_n)}$
- A non-geometrical approach to this surds question
- If $\sqrt{9−8\cos 40^{\circ}} = a +b\sec 40^{\circ}$, then what is $|a+b|$?
- Finding minimum value of $\sqrt{x^2+y^2}$
- Polynomial Equation Problem with Complex Roots
Related Questions in RATIONALITY-TESTING
- Irrationality of $\log_2(2015)$
- Find an equation where all 'y' is always irrational for all integer values of x
- What is Euler doing?
- Is there an essential difference between Cartwright's and Niven's proofs of the irrationality of $\pi$?
- $\sqrt{\frac{\pi e}{2}}=\frac{1}{1+\mathrm{K}_{i=1}^{\infty}{\frac{i}{1}}}+\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}{\frac{1}{(2n+1)!!}}$ implies $\sqrt{\pi e/2}\notin Q$?
- Rationality of circumference of an ellipsis with rational semi-axes
- Rationality of the Gamma function
- Can we find smallest positive $x$ such that $\pi^x$ is rational?
- For the expression $\sqrt{\frac{x}{y}}$ to be rational, is it necessary for both to be squares?
- Spivak Calculus 4-th Ed., Chapter 2, Exercise 13a, Understanding the proof of $\sqrt3$ being irrational.
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Suppose $a$ and $b$ are integers with no bigger common divisors than $1$, and $m,n>1$ are integers. Suppose $$ \sqrt[n]{m} = \frac a b. $$ Then $$ b^n m = a^n. $$ Consider prime factorizations of $b$ and $a$: $$ \left(q_1^{e^1}\cdots q_k^{e_k}\right)^n m = p_1^{f_1}\cdots p_\ell^{f_\ell}. $$ Since none of $p_1,\ldots,p_\ell$ is a divisor of $\left(q_1^{e^1}\cdots q_k^{e_k}\right)^n$, we must have $p_1^{f_1}\cdots p_\ell^{f_\ell}$ dividing $m$, but that makes the left side bigger than the right side unless $b=1$. From that we conclude that $a/b$ is an integer. So it's only when the $n$th root is an integer that the $n$th root is rational.
Perhaps the hard part of the proof is what I haven't yet mentioned: prove that an integer cannot have more than one prime factorization. That was tacitly used above. (Maybe one can get by with a somewhat weaker result.)