Can anyone explain the relationship among limsup, inf and sup in this proof?

85 Views Asked by At

I'm studying analysis with Principles of Mathematical Analysis written by Walter Rudin.

enter image description here

In the proof of 11.7 Theorem, I don't understand how it can be proven that h is measurable.

I understand the first part of the proof which proves that g is measurable.

However, I can't follow how $h(x)$ is equal to $\inf g_{m}(x)$.

In the definition of $h(x)$ in the 11.7 Theorem, $h(x)$ is equal to $\limsup\limits_{n\rightarrow\infty} f_{n}(x)$.

Why is $\limsup\limits_{n\rightarrow\infty} f_{n}(x)$ equal to $\inf g_{m}(x)$?

Can anyone explain the relationship between $\limsup$ and $\inf$ in this case?

In addition, I don't understand how $g_{m}(x)$ is equal to $\sup f_{n}(x) (n\geq m).$

Especially, I suspect that $\sup f_{n}(x) (n\geq m)$ is misprinting and It should be $\sup f_{\bf{m}}(x) (n\geq m)$.

Should the $n$ at the last line of the proof be changed to $m$?

1

There are 1 best solutions below

5
On BEST ANSWER

Pointwise, for any fixed $x\in X$ you have $\limsup\limits_{n\rightarrow\infty} f_{n}(x)= \underset{n\to \infty}{\lim}\big( \underset{k\geq n}{\sup} f_k(x) \big)$. However $\Big\{ \underset{k\geq n}{\sup} f_k(x) \Big\}_{n=1}^\infty$ is a decreasing sequence of values, since you are taking sup on smaller subsets, so the limit is the infimum of the last sequence.

They are defining $g_m(x):=\underset{n\geq m}{\sup} f_n(x)$, and they claim that $h(x)$ is the pointwise limit of $g_m$.

Later Edit:

The claim that $\limsup\limits_{n\rightarrow\infty} f_{n}(x)= \underset{n\to \infty}{\lim}\big( \underset{k\geq n}{\sup} f_k(x) \big)$, or alternatively that $\liminf\limits_{n\rightarrow\infty} f_{n}(x)= \underset{n\to \infty}{\lim}\big( \underset{k\geq n}{\inf} f_k(x) \big)$, is something you can see for example in Two definitions of lim sup. Pointwise limit just means that the limiting function is at each point $x$, the value of the limit function $f(x)$, satisfies $f(x)=\lim f_n(x)$.

Your other question is essentially why a monotonic sequence of measurable functions is measurable. This usually follows from considerations of the preimages. Essentially to show measurability, you need to show that the preimages of rays, $\{ x: h(x)\leq b \}$ or $\{ x: h(x)\geq a \}$, are measurable sets. You need to note that $$ \{x:\ sup_{n\in \Bbb N}f_n\ (x)\geq a\}=\bigcup_{n=1}^{\infty}\{x:\ f_n(x)\geq a\}$$ and $$\{x:\ sup_{n\in \Bbb N}f_n\ (x)\leq b\}= \bigcap_{n=1}^{\infty}\{x:\ f_n(x)\leq b\}. $$

You can also look at Sequence of measurable functions (lim sup) or the accepted answer in {x:limfn(x) exists} is a measurable set, for details.