Can every multiple of $3$ be written as arithmetic mean of two pairs of twin prime numbers ???
let's suppose, one of the twin prime pair is $P_1 ,P_1+2$ and another pair is $P_2, P_2+2$. Where $P_1$ and $P_2$ are distinct .
Let's imagine $$T_1=P_1 +(P_1+2)$$ and $$T_2=P_2+(P_2+2)$$ .
$$3n = \frac{T1+T2}{4}$$ where $n\in N$ and $n>2$
For example
$$9 = \frac{(5+7)+(11+13)}{4}$$
Is there any counter example?
It can be also written as $12n=T_1+T_2$
that means every multiple of twelve can be written as summation of two pairs of twin prime numbers
Can every multiple of $3$ be written as arithmetic mean of two pairs of twin prime numbers ???
195 Views Asked by user508245 https://math.techqa.club/user/user508245/detail AtThere are 2 best solutions below
On
(Too long for a comment.)
I. Twin primes $p,\,p+2$
If we define the $11$ integers mentioned above,
$$S=16,67,86,131,151,186,191,211,226,541,701 $$
then,
$$T=6S-2,\; 6S,\; 6S+2$$
are the $33$ integers $N>4$ of A007534,
$$T=94, 96, 98, 400, 402, 404, 514, 516, 518,\dots$$
which is conjectured to be a finite sequence and defined as "Even numbers that are not the sum of a pair of twin primes." (These exceptions are more orderly than the one below.)
II. Cousin primes $p,\,p+4$
If we define the $10+3$ integers,
$$U_1=8, 72, 282, 648, 912, 1062, 1332, 2118, 2298, 2532$$ $$U_2 = 642, 1422, 2952$$ and, $$V_1=U_1-4,\; U_1,\; U_1+4$$ $$V_2=U_2-4,\; U_2$$
then $V_1,V_2$ are the $36$ integers $N>2$ of A133802 which is also conjectured to be a finite sequence and defined as "Even numbers which are not the sum of a pair of cousin primes."
III. Sexy primes $p,\,p+6$
An initial computer search suggests all even $N>8$ is the sum of a pair of sexy primes.
There are several counterexamples; written as multiples of 12, examples include 192, 804, and 1032. These were generated by the C++ code below (note: highly inefficient).
Edit: I decided to write a somewhat more efficient version of my code, and found out that up to $2^{26}$ (about 67 million) the only counterexamples, written as multiples of 12 and disregarding 0 and 12, I could find are 192, 804, 1032, 1572, 1812, 2232, 2292, 2532, 2712, 6492, and 8412. So there might still be something to your conjecture; perhaps it only has finitely many counterexamples, and in particular, perhaps 8412 is the largest counterexample?
Edit: it is indeed a standing conjecture that these are the only counterexamples; see the comment by Tito Piezas below. That's surprising! I thought there would be far fewer twin primes than primes.