Can $\mathbb{R}^{+}$ be divided into two disjoint nonempty sets so that each set is closed under both addition and multiplication?
I know if we only require both sets to be closed under addition then this can be done. For example, this post gives an answer.
Thank you very much!
This is an adaptation of the construction in the paper by Daniel Kane (linked in Jorge's answer).
Claim: There exists a non-trivial $\mathbb{Q}$-linear derivation on $\mathbb{R}$.
Before giving the proof, a non-trivial derivation $D$ lets us define a partition of $\mathbb{R}^+$ by $$ A=\big\{x\in \mathbb{R}^+:D(x) \geq 0\big\},\,\,\,\, B=\big\{x\in \mathbb{R}^+:D(x) < 0\big\}. $$ The sets $A$ and $B$ are closed under addition because $D$ is $\mathbb{Q}$-linear, and are closed under multiplication by the Leibniz rule. The partition is non-trivial because $D$ is non-trivial: if $x\in\mathbb{R}^+$ satisfies $D(x)\neq 0$, then $D(x)$ and $D(x^{-1})=-x^{-2}D(x)$ have opposite sign.
Proof of the claim: We construct a derivation with $D(\pi)=1$. Consider the set of pairs $(A,D)$, where $A$ is a subring of $\mathbb{R}$ containing $\pi$ and $D:A\to\mathbb{R}$ is a derivation satisfying $D(\pi)=1$. This set is non-empty because it contains $(\mathbb{Q}[\pi],\frac{d}{d\pi})$, and is partially ordered by extension. The set satisfies the hypotheses of Zorn's Lemma, so contains a maximal element $(A,D)$. It must be the case that $A=\mathbb{R}$, because if $x\in\mathbb{R}\backslash A$ we can extend $D$ to $A[x]$: if $x$ is transcendental over $A$ we set $D(x)=0$, and if $x$ is algebraic over $A$ with minimal polynomial $f$ we set $D(x)=-D(f)(x)/f'(x)$, where $D(f)$ is the polynomial obtained by applying $D$ to the coefficients of $f$.