My proof: Let $\varepsilon > 0$ be arbitrary. Since $f$ is continuous on the compact set $[a, b]$, $f$ is uniformly continuous on $[a, b]$. Thus there exists $\delta > 0$ such that for each $x, y \in [a, b]$, $|x - y| < \delta$ implies $|f(x) - f(y)| < \frac{\varepsilon}{2}$. Now partition $[a, b]$ into $k = \text{ceil}\left(\frac{b - a}{\frac{\delta}{2}}\right)$ intervals $[t_1 = a, t_2), [t_2, t_3), \dots, [t_{k - 1}, t_k), [t_k, t_{k + 1} = b]$ with $t_{j + 1} - t_j \leq \frac{\delta}{2}$ for each $j \in \{1, 2, \dots, k\}$. For each $j \in \{1, 2, \dots, k\}$, let $N_j$ be such that for each $n \geq N_j$, $|f_n(t_j) - f(t_j)| < \frac{\varepsilon}{2}$. Let $N = \max(N_1, N_2, \dots, N_k)$. Now to show uniform convergence, let $n \geq N, x \in [a, b]$ be arbitrary. Let $t_i$ be the left endpoint of the interval containing $x$. Since $f_n$ is increasing and $t_i \leq x \leq t_{i + 1}$, we have $f_n(t_i) \leq f_n(x) \leq f_n(t_{i + 1})$. Thus we have $f_n(x) - f(x) \geq f_n(t_i) - f(x) = f_n(t_i) - f(t_i) + f(t_i) - f(x) > -\frac{\varepsilon}{2} + -\frac{\varepsilon}{2} = -\varepsilon$ and $f_n(x) - f(x) \leq f_n(t_{i + 1}) - f(x) = f_n(t_{i + 1}) - f(t_{i + 1}) + f(t_{i + 1}) - f(x) < \frac{\varepsilon}{2} + \frac{\varepsilon}{2} = \varepsilon$. Thus $|f_n(x) - f(x)| < \varepsilon$. Thus $(f_n) \to f$ uniformly.
2026-04-06 10:54:51.1775472891
Can someone check my proof (Abbott exercise 6.2.10)
316 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in REAL-ANALYSIS
- how is my proof on equinumerous sets
- Finding radius of convergence $\sum _{n=0}^{}(2+(-1)^n)^nz^n$
- Optimization - If the sum of objective functions are similar, will sum of argmax's be similar
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Justify an approximation of $\sum_{n=1}^\infty G_n/\binom{\frac{n}{2}+\frac{1}{2}}{\frac{n}{2}}$, where $G_n$ denotes the Gregory coefficients
- Calculating the radius of convergence for $\sum _{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\left(\sqrt{ n^2+n}-\sqrt{n^2+1}\right)^n}{n^2}z^n$
- Is this relating to continuous functions conjecture correct?
- What are the functions satisfying $f\left(2\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{3^i}\right)=\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{2^i}$
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- A particular exercise on convergence of recursive sequence
Related Questions in SOLUTION-VERIFICATION
- Linear transform of jointly distributed exponential random variables, how to identify domain?
- Exercise 7.19 from Papa Rudin: Gathering solutions
- Proof verification: $\forall n \in \mathbb{Z}, 4\nmid(n^2+2)$
- Proof verification: a function with finitely many points of discontinuity is Riemann integrable
- Do Monoid Homomorphisms preserve the identity?
- Cantor-Lebesgue's theorem
- If $a$ is an integer, prove that $\gcd(14a + 3, 21a + 4) = 1$.
- Number theory gcd
- $|G| > 1$ and not prime implies existence of a subgroup other than two trivial subgroups
- Prove/Disprove: Sum of im/ker of linear transformation contained in ker/im of each linear trasnfromation
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?

Nice proof. It looks fine to me and I didn't find any mistakes. (I would leave this as a comment instead but I do not have enough reputation points)