I have been trying to find the length of an arc of an ellipse and I have been stuck with this integral for a complete day : $$\int_{0}^{x} \sqrt{a^2\cos^2t+b^2\sin^2t} dt$$ And my question is : can this integral be expressed in terms of elementary functions ? If not then does this integral have a special function or something ?
2026-03-25 23:36:35.1774481795
can this integral be expressed in elementary functions?
432 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in CALCULUS
- Equality of Mixed Partial Derivatives - Simple proof is Confusing
- How can I prove that $\int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}}\frac{\ln(1+\cos(\alpha)\cos(x))}{\cos(x)}dx=\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{\pi^2}{4}-\alpha^2\right)$?
- Proving the differentiability of the following function of two variables
- If $f ◦f$ is differentiable, then $f ◦f ◦f$ is differentiable
- Calculating the radius of convergence for $\sum _{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\left(\sqrt{ n^2+n}-\sqrt{n^2+1}\right)^n}{n^2}z^n$
- Number of roots of the e
- What are the functions satisfying $f\left(2\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{3^i}\right)=\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{2^i}$
- Why the derivative of $T(\gamma(s))$ is $T$ if this composition is not a linear transformation?
- How to prove $\frac 10 \notin \mathbb R $
- Proving that: $||x|^{s/2}-|y|^{s/2}|\le 2|x-y|^{s/2}$
Related Questions in INTEGRATION
- How can I prove that $\int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}}\frac{\ln(1+\cos(\alpha)\cos(x))}{\cos(x)}dx=\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{\pi^2}{4}-\alpha^2\right)$?
- How to integrate $\int_{0}^{t}{\frac{\cos u}{\cosh^2 u}du}$?
- Show that $x\longmapsto \int_{\mathbb R^n}\frac{f(y)}{|x-y|^{n-\alpha }}dy$ is integrable.
- How to find the unit tangent vector of a curve in R^3
- multiplying the integrands in an inequality of integrals with same limits
- Closed form of integration
- Proving smoothness for a sequence of functions.
- Random variables in integrals, how to analyze?
- derive the expectation of exponential function $e^{-\left\Vert \mathbf{x} - V\mathbf{x}+\mathbf{a}\right\Vert^2}$ or its upper bound
- Which type of Riemann Sum is the most accurate?
Related Questions in ELLIPTIC-FUNCTIONS
- How to convert $\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{0}^{2\pi}\sqrt{(ucos(\theta)+v\sin(\theta))^2-(u^2+v^2-1)} d\theta$ to an elliptic integral?
- Finding zeros of the elliptic function $f(z) = \sum_{\omega \in \Omega} \frac{1}{(z - \omega)^3}$
- Calculating derivatives of the Weierstrass $\wp$-function in terms of $\wp$ and $\wp '$
- Dimension of space of meromorphic functions on torus with only one pole
- Extension of a conformal mapping to an elliptic function
- Can a polynomial be expressed as a rational function in Weierstrass functions?
- Integer solutions of $ax^3 + bx^2 + cx - y^2 = k$
- Meromorphic Functions that satisfy a first order algebraic differential equation
- ODE and elliptic function (Pendulum)
- Do we have a conformal mapping from the regular pentagon to the disk?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
The answer to the question in the title is
No, the integral cannot be expressed in terms of elementary functions. Elementary functions are a fairly restricted group (like polynomials, the exponential function and the natural logarithm).
But you go on to ask whether it can be expressed in terms of special functions or something.
The short answer is that it is easy to get arc lengths along an ellipse in terms of an incomplete elliptic function of the second kind. But you need software like Mathematica (where it is EllipticE[]) to be able to use it freely.
The incomplete elliptic function (the complete/incomplete distinction is about whether the function deals with the complete curve or only an arc) is certainly a "special function or something".
Whether it is a special function is more debatable.
Personally, I don't think I would refer to this function as a special function. Wikipedia disagrees, so does the NIST bible. But the term "special function" is often used for a relatively small group of functions which were mainly important in physics and applied maths and intensively studied in the century or more before WW2 (usually as functions of a complex variable).
In any case the term "special function" is starting to get archaic, and I don't think it is a helpful one today. Long ago they were special in the ordinary English language sense, because they had been extensively studied and people knew how to deal with them, although they required more expertise than the "elementary" functions. [Whereas many other functions were fairly intractable except by inequalities, bounds, crude approximations etc.]
Today I would rather call something like the functions used for ellipse arc length a "named function". The reason is that it is possible to use it (and indeed many of the old special functions) with much less special expertise.
What often matters in practice today is not so much whether a function is an "elementary" or "special" function, but whether it is easy to calculate with the function using software like Mathematica.
If you want more information on how to use the complete/incomplete elliptic functions, I suggest googling. You can find plenty of tutorial material about ellipse arc lengths and the functions used to deal with them. Eg here (about halfway through he turns to elliptic integrals).
There is also a fair amount of material in Wikipedia scattered over several articles.
Added a little later
Incidentally, do not think of math software as just a way of getting numerical answers or plotting functions with known parameters (ie $\sin 2x$ rather than $\sin kx$). It is much more powerful than that. For many functions you can easily get indefinite integrals, power series etc.
I remember spending a significant chunk of my undergraduate years at Cambridge University many decades ago learning endless tricks for integrating functions. That knowledge is of little use to me now. Mathematica easily outperforms most academics on this site at integration (and certainly me, but notably not Jack d'Aurizio, whose expertise with integrals often delights me).
In general, you can cheerfully manipulate its named functions just as easily as if they were elementary functions.
I mention Mathematica just because it is widely available and good for integration. But there is a good deal of both commercial and open source software available.