Can we divide $\mathbb{R}^2$ into two connected parts such that each part is not simply-connected?
My attempt
Put $A= \{ (0,0) \} $ and $B$ is the punctured plane.
Since that $S^1$ is a deformation retract of the punctured plane, $B$ is not simply-connected. Thus we can find a division of $\mathbb{R}^2$ such that one part is simply-connected but the other is not.
But how to deal with the problem above which requires that each part is not simply-connected?
It seems to be related to contractible and holes. But I don't know how to convert these ideas into precise mathematical language.
Any hints? Thanks in advance!
Added:
As pointed out in the comment, the counterexample exists.
Now I want to ask another question
Can we divide $\mathbb{R}^2$ into two path connected parts such that each part is not simply connected?
The answer to the modified question:
is no, this is not possible. In fact, if $A$ and $B$ are disjoint sets with $A\cup B=\mathbb R^2$ then, if $A,B$ are path connected but $A$ is not simply connected, then $B$ must be bounded. So, if $A$ and $B$ are both path connected but not simply connected, then they must both be bounded, giving a contradiction.
I will make use of the following lemma, from the paper The fundamental groups of subsets of closed surfaces inject into their first shape groups.
So, suppose $A$ is connected but not simply connected. Then there is a curve $\alpha\colon S^1\to A$ which is not null-homotopic. The complement $\mathbb R^2\setminus {\rm Im}(\alpha)=\bigcup_iU_i$ decomposes as the union of its connected components $U_i$. As $B\subseteq\bigcup_iU_i$ is connected, it will be contained within one of the $U_i$. We show that $U_i$ is bounded: As $\mathbb R^2\setminus U_i\subseteq A$, $\alpha$ is not null-homotopic in $\mathbb R^2\setminus U_i$. If $U_i$ were unbounded, then the quoted result says that $\alpha$ is not null-homotopic in $\mathbb R^2$, a contradiction.