Let M be a 2nd countable Hausdorff space. Let F be a set of functions from open sets of M to R. Does there exist a smooth structure on M that makes these functions smooth? Is this an equivalent way to define a manifold? Similar to how you can uniquely define a topological space by having a set of functions to be consider continuous?
2026-03-30 03:39:17.1774841957
Can you uniquely define a smooth manifold M by taking the set of functions from M to R you consider smooth?
221 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL-GEOMETRY
- Smooth Principal Bundle from continuous transition functions?
- Compute Thom and Euler class
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Alternative definition for characteristic foliation of a surface
- Studying regular space curves when restricted to two differentiable functions
- What kind of curvature does a cylinder have?
- A new type of curvature multivector for surfaces?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- Show that two isometries induce the same linear mapping
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
Related Questions in SMOOTH-MANIFOLDS
- Smooth Principal Bundle from continuous transition functions?
- Possible condition on locally Euclidean subsets of Euclidean space to be embedded submanifold
- "Defining a smooth structure on a topological manifold with boundary"
- Hyperboloid is a manifold
- The graph of a smooth map is a manifold
- A finite group G acts freely on a simply connected manifold M
- An elementary proof that low rank maps cannot be open
- What does it mean by standard coordinates on $R^n$
- Partial Differential Equation using theory of manifolds
- Showing that a diffeomorphism preserves the boundary
Related Questions in SMOOTH-FUNCTIONS
- Connecting smooth functions in a smooth way
- Is the restriction (to lower dimensions) of a smooth function still smooth?
- Understanding the proof of the Concentration-Compactness principle
- Does an integral inequality imply a pointwise inequality?
- A weird definition of regular function
- Are charts for smooth manifolds homeomorphisms or diffeomorphisms?
- Find a sequence $(\phi_n)_n \subset C^{\infty}_c(\mathbb{R}^N)$ which converges in both $L^p(\nu)$ and $L^q(\mu)$ to $1_E$
- Straight Lines are Strict Minimizers of Arclength in Euclidean Space
- Several Questions on Smooth Urysohn's Lemma
- For what functions is $\lim_{n\to \infty}|f^{(n)}(x)|=0$? (Where $f^{(n)}(x)$ is the $n$th derivative of $f$)
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
$\newcommand{\R}{\mathbb{R}}$ No matter what you have to use the concept of $C^\infty(\R)$ to impose additional assumptions on the set $F$ of functions on a set $M$ for $M$ to be a smooth manifold and for $F$ to be a set of smooth functions for a manifold structure. The additional assumptions should simply imply the existence of an atlas. This can be expressed without any assumption on $M$ itself and only on a set $F$ of scalar functions. Here is one possible set of assumptions.
An obvious necessary condition is that $F$ is a ring over $C^\infty(\R)$. In other words, the following have to hold:
Another obvious necessary condition is:
At least one more assumption is needed to get the local Euclidean structure. Here, I think, is one sufficient assumption:
There exists a collection of maps $\Phi = (\phi^1, \dots, \phi^n): M \rightarrow \R^n$, which we'll call coordinate maps, such that the following hold:
a) $\phi_1, \dots, \phi_n \in F$
b) For each coordinate map $\Phi$, there exists a set $O \subset M$ such that the map $$\Phi = (\phi^1, \dots, \phi^n): O \rightarrow \Phi(O) $$ is a bijection and $\Phi(O) \subset \R^n$ is open.
c) There exists a countable collection of coordinate maps $\Phi_k: O_k \rightarrow \R^n$ such that $$ \bigcup\limits_k O_k = M. $$
d) If $\Phi_1: O_1\rightarrow \R^n$ and $\Phi_2: O_2 \rightarrow \R^n$ are coordinate maps such that $O_1 \cap O_2 \ne \emptyset$, then the map $$\Phi_2\circ\Phi_1: O_1\cap O_2 \rightarrow \R^n$$ is smooth and bijective.
e) Given two different points $p_1, p_2 \in M$, there exist coordinate maps $\Phi_1: O_1 \rightarrow \R^n$, $\Phi_2: O_2 \rightarrow \R^n$ such that $p_1 \in O_1$, $p_2 \in O_2$, and $O_1 \cap O_2 = \emptyset$.