If a set is endowed with the discrete topology then a subset is compact iff it is finite.
Is the converse true? That is, given a Hausdorff topological space such that every compact subset is finite, then is the topology necessary discrete?
If a set is endowed with the discrete topology then a subset is compact iff it is finite.
Is the converse true? That is, given a Hausdorff topological space such that every compact subset is finite, then is the topology necessary discrete?
On
There is also another example, kind of standard, Arens space.
As yet another example consider the Stone-Cech compactification of the integers $\beta \Bbb N$, and take $x$ in the remainder and consider the space $X=\{x\}\cup \Bbb N$. It is known that every compact subset of $\beta \Bbb N$ mist be either finite, or have cardinality $2^\frak c$, so compact subsets of $X$ must be finite.
These two examples are not compactly generated, where a space $X$ is compactly generated, also called a $k$-space if it satisfies the following condition: A subspace $A$ is closed in $X$ if and only if $A\cap K$ is closed in $K$ for all compact subspaces $K\subseteq X$.
It is clear that if $X$ a is compactly generated Hausdorff and all compact subsets are finite the $X$ has the discrete topology. The class of compactly generated spaces includes all metrizable spaces, as well as all 1st-countable spaces, and all locally compact spaces.
The converse is not true. Consider the set of continuous functions $[0,1]\to \mathbb{R}$ in the box topology. $X$ is Hausdorff, and a sequence $x_1,x_2,\ldots$ of points of $X$ converges if and only if it is eventually constant by a diagonal argument using the fact that if two continuous functions differ at only finitely many points then they are equal. Therefore any infinite subset of $X$ cannot be compact because there exist sequences of points in the set with no convergent subsequences. $X$ is not discrete because one point sets are not open.