I was asked to prove the following:
Consider $A:=\left\{\frac1n: n=1,2,3,...\right\}$ and $B:=A\cup\{0\}$. Then, $B\times \Bbb R$ is not a smooth sub-manifold of $\Bbb R^2$, but $A\times \Bbb R$ is a smooth submanifold of $\Bbb R^2$.
I have the following reasonings:
$(1)$ There doesn't exist an open subset $U$ of $\Bbb R^2$ containing $(0,0)$ such that $U\cap B$ homeomorphic to an open subset of $\Bbb R$: The set $U\cap B$ consists of a sequence of vertical open intervals converging to another vertical interval. Also, any open subset of $\Bbb R$ is a collection of pairwise disjoint open intervals. So, $B$ is not a sub-manifold of $\Bbb R^2$.
$(2)$ Note that each vertical slice of $A\times \Bbb R$ is isolated from any other vertical slices, maintaining a fixed distance(though it may be small) at least from other slices.
Are these reasonings correct?
Thanks in advance.
Your argument is convincing, though not rigorous enough.
For (1) maybe the cleanest way is to observe that $(0,0)$ doesn't have a connected neighborhood in $B\times\Bbb R$, whereas in $\Bbb R^n$ every point has.
For (2) every point has a vertical open segment as neighborhood.