I wanted to ask about something confusing in my Lie Algebras notes.
At one point we define the Lie Algebra $\mathfrak{gl}(V)$ to be the vector space $GL_n(V)$ with the bracket $[x , y ] = xy - yx$. (Here $V$ is an $n$-dimensional vector space over a field, $k$.)
Later, it says "let $\mathfrak{gl}(V) = End(V)$ with bracket given by $[x,y] = xy - yx$.
The use of the word "let" here confuses me. Given the same notation of $\mathfrak{gl}(V)$ I expect that these two Lie Algebras should be equivalent.
However, my understanding is that $GL_n(V)$ is the vector space of invertible $n \times n$ matrices over the field $k$, with respect to a chosen basis of $V$, and that $End(V)$ is simple the vector space of Endomorphisms of $V$.
However, this definition of $\mathfrak{gl}(V)$ seems to imply that, as vector spaces, $End(V) = GL_n(V)$, but this then implies that everything in $End(V)$ is invertible, which is not the case.
I am very confused by this. Should the $End(V)$ be replaced with $Aut(V)$? Am I misunderstanding something simple about Lie Algebras, $GL_n(V)$ or $End(V)$?
I would really appreciate some help understanding this, thank you.
The first reference to $GL$ is wrong and the reference to $End$ is correct. Indeed, $GL(V)$ is not preserved by the bracket since for instance a matrix bracketed with itself is not invertible.