I'm working through a proof of the classification of finite rotation groups in the Euclidean Space (i.e. finite subgroups of $SO_3$) and am not understanding a particular step. My proof is from M.A. Armstrong's Groups and Symmetry in case anybody has it available, but the particular step I'm struggling with is also executed the same way in this paper.
In case (d) (the icosahedral case - bottom of page 14 in the PDF linked here and bottom of p.108 / top of p.110 in Armstrong), it is claimed that we can find $u,v$ in the orbit of $z$ such that the following holds:
$ 0 < \lVert z -u \rVert < \lVert z -v \rVert < 2. $
Now it is clear that the only point with distance $2$ from $z$ is $-z$, but what I don't understand is why all the points in $G(z) \setminus \{z,-z\}$ can't have the same distance from $z$. Can anybody clarify?
I didn't read everything up to that point, and it may be that I missed something simpler. Because I concentrated on that case only, I do agree with you that the point you are concerned about is not fully justified there.
But, aided by the surrounding text, it is not too difficult to come up with an argument bridging this gap: