Where can I read a proof that every simply connected Riemann surface is isomorphic to the upper half plane, the complex plane, or the Riemann sphere?
2026-03-28 21:56:57.1774735017
classification of simply connected Riemann surfaces
258 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in BOOK-RECOMMENDATION
- Books recommendations for a second lecture in functional analysis
- Book/Online Video Lectures/Notes Recommendation for Analysis(topics mentioned)
- Are there any analysis textbooks like Charles Pinter's A book of abstract algebra?
- Calculus book suggestion
- How to use the AOPS books?
- What are good books cover these topics?
- Book Recommendation: Introduction to probability theory (including stochastic processes)
- calculus of variations with double integral textbook?
- Probability that two random numbers have a Sørensen-Dice coefficient over a given threshold
- Algebraic geometry and algebraic topology used in string theory
Related Questions in RIEMANN-SURFACES
- Composing with a biholomorphic function does not affect the order of pole
- open-source illustrations of Riemann surfaces
- I want the pullback of a non-closed 1-form to be closed. Is that possible?
- Reference request for Riemann Roch Theorem
- Biholomorphic Riemann Surfaces can have different differential structure?
- Monodromy representations and geodesics of singular flat metrics on $\mathbb{H}$
- How to choose a branch when there are multiple branch points?
- Questions from Forster's proof regarding unbranched holomorphic proper covering map
- Is the monodromy action of the universal covering of a Riemann surface faithful?
- Riemann sheets for combined roots
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
You can read it in "Canadian Journal of Mathematics (Aug.1972)". I personally learned the proof from this paper, Uniformization of Riemann Surfaces. They actually provide three methods of proof, and I found the first of these the easiest to follow. Its not too difficult to go through the proof in detail if you know a bit of topology and complex analysis. The idea is to construct a global analytic function by minimizing a Dirichlet integral. Then, by working out the properties of "flow lines" - on which the function has constant imaginary part - you can get a good idea of what the map looks like, and then show that it is either a mapping onto the Riemann sphere, the Riemann sphere with the origin removed (equiv to the complex plane) or the Riemann sphere with a line segment removed (equiv to the open unit disk).
The second method they provide relies on triangulating the surface. The proof constructs the mapping inductively on larger and larger sets of triangles, using the Riemann mapping theorem to construct maps and the Schwarz reflection principle to join them together.
They also provide a third method, based on sheaf cohomology, although I am not so familiar with this method. The idea is to construct geometric realizations of projective structures on the Riemann surface. However, it does not seem to be quite complete, and there are some unresolved problems posed at the end.