Is there a way to simply explain cobordism and h-cobordism? I am not looking for a math based explanation, but rather, just the main ideas behind the concepts.
2026-05-11 00:43:23.1778460203
Cobordism and h-cobordism
345 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in GENERAL-TOPOLOGY
- Is every non-locally compact metric space totally disconnected?
- Let X be a topological space and let A be a subset of X
- Continuity, preimage of an open set of $\mathbb R^2$
- Question on minimizing the infimum distance of a point from a non compact set
- Is hedgehog of countable spininess separable space?
- Nonclosed set in $ \mathbb{R}^2 $
- I cannot understand that $\mathfrak{O} := \{\{\}, \{1\}, \{1, 2\}, \{3\}, \{1, 3\}, \{1, 2, 3\}\}$ is a topology on the set $\{1, 2, 3\}$.
- If for every continuous function $\phi$, the function $\phi \circ f$ is continuous, then $f$ is continuous.
- Defining a homotopy on an annulus
- Triangle inequality for metric space where the metric is angles between vectors
Related Questions in SOFT-QUESTION
- Reciprocal-totient function, in term of the totient function?
- Ordinals and cardinals in ETCS set axiomatic
- Does approximation usually exclude equality?
- Transition from theory of PDEs to applied analysis and industrial problems and models with PDEs
- Online resources for networking and creating new mathematical collaborations
- Random variables in integrals, how to analyze?
- Could anyone give an **example** that a problem that can be solved by creating a new group?
- How do you prevent being lead astray when you're working on a problem that takes months/years?
- Is it impossible to grasp Multivariable Calculus with poor prerequisite from Single variable calculus?
- A definite integral of a rational function: How can this be transformed from trivial to obvious by a change in viewpoint?
Related Questions in HOMOTOPY-THEORY
- how to prove this homotopic problem
- Are $[0,1]$ and $(0,1)$ homotopy equivalent?
- two maps are not homotopic equivalent
- the quotien space of $ S^1\times S^1$
- Can $X=SO(n)\setminus\{I_n\}$be homeomorphic to or homotopic equivalent to product of spheres?
- Why do $S^1 \wedge - $ and $Maps(S^1,-)$ form a Quillen adjunction?
- Is $S^{n-1}$ a deformation retract of $S^{n}$ \ {$k$ points}?
- Connection between Mayer-Vietoris and higher dimensional Seifert-Van Kampen Theorems
- Why is the number of exotic spheres equivalent to $S^7,S^{11},S^{15},S^{27}$ equal to perfect numbers?
- Are the maps homotopic?
Related Questions in COBORDISM
- Cobordisms and compactness
- Cobordism and Boundary Theorem (Guillemin-Pollack)
- Handle attachment and spin$^c$ structures
- Limitive result in constructing cobordisms for 3-manifolds
- Formal group law of complex cobordism
- Pontryagin-Thom construction references for homotopy groups of spheres
- Orientable double-cover of the Mobius strip
- Why is the $J$-homomorphism an isomorphism for $n=1$?
- Understanding Corollaries of the h-cobordism theorem
- Cobordant 1-manifolds are homologous?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
geometry
circles
algebraic-number-theory
functions
real-analysis
elementary-set-theory
proof-verification
proof-writing
number-theory
elementary-number-theory
puzzle
game-theory
calculus
multivariable-calculus
partial-derivative
complex-analysis
logic
set-theory
second-order-logic
homotopy-theory
winding-number
ordinary-differential-equations
numerical-methods
derivatives
integration
definite-integrals
probability
limits
sequences-and-series
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
A cobordism between two manifolds $M$ and $N$ of the same dimension $n$ is a manifold $P$ of dimension $n+1$ so that the boundary of $P$ is diffeomorphic to the disjoint union of $M$ and $N$. So, a cobordism between $M$ and $N$ can be thought of as saying that $M$ and $N$ are two $n$-dimensional puzzle pieces, that when put together form the border of a completed $n+1$-dimensional picture.
It helps to think of some examples: Let's take $M=\{a\}$ and $N=\{b\}$ for real numbers $a<b$. Then $P=[a,b]$ is a cobordism of $M$ and $N$ because the boundary of $[a,b]$ is $\{a,b\}=\{a\}\cup\{b\}$. An example with $M$ and $N$ different is to take $M$ to be a circle and $N$ to be two disjoint circles. Then a cobordism $P$ is a pair of pants with $M$ the waist of the pants and $N$ the two leg-holes.
An $h$-cobordism contains even more information: it says that not only are $M$ and $N$ puzzle pieces that fit together to form the border of a completed picture, but the way that they fit into that completed picture is the same, up to maybe a little squishing and squeezing. More specifically, the images of $M$ and $N$ in the cobordism $P$ must be homotopic: this means that one can be "continuously deformed" into the other. Maybe we could stretch part of $M$ out and squeeze part of $N$ together, and in doing so, we realize that we have made $M$ and $N$ look the same inside of $P$. It's like our puzzle pieces are made out of rubber once we complete the picture, so we can stretch them until they look the same.
In our $[a,b]$ example above, we actually have an $h$-cobordism, because $\{a\}$ and $\{b\}$ are both included in $[a,b]$ in pretty much the same way: define $i_1:\{a\}\to[a,b]$ by $i_1(a)=a$ and $i_2:\{b\}\to[a,b]$ by $i_2(b)=b$. Both of these maps don't really move anything around, and the result looks the same: the image is just a point.