So I am currently wondering about how one can write down the codomain of a function that is only almost everywhere defined. In particular, I am looking at the radon nikodym derivative $f$, which is only defined almost everyhwere. So how could I possibly write down the codomain of this function? Some books write down sth like that it maps to $[0, \infty)$. But there actually might be a nullset where it maps to infinity, right? So then we would have to include that in the codomain, since the codomain should be independent of any measures and of what happens when integrating the function.
2026-02-23 16:55:55.1771865755
Codomain of almost everywhere defined functions
69 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in MEASURE-THEORY
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- I can't undestand why $ \{x \in X : f(x) > g(x) \} = \bigcup_{r \in \mathbb{Q}}{\{x\in X : f(x) > r\}\cap\{x\in X:g(x) < r\}} $
- Trace $\sigma$-algebra of a product $\sigma$-algebra is product $\sigma$-algebra of the trace $\sigma$-algebras
- Meaning of a double integral
- Random variables coincide
- Convergence in measure preserves measurability
- Convergence in distribution of a discretized random variable and generated sigma-algebras
- A sequence of absolutely continuous functions whose derivatives converge to $0$ a.e
- $f\in L_{p_1}\cap L_{p_2}$ implies $f\in L_{p}$ for all $p\in (p_1,p_2)$
Related Questions in ALMOST-EVERYWHERE
- Normed bounded sequence of $L^2[0,1]$
- A function which is not equal almost everywhere (wrt Lebesgue measure) to a continuous function and not almost everywhere continuous function
- $f:\mathbb R \to \mathbb R$ measurable and $f(x)=f(x+1)$ almost everywhere
- Proof that if $f_n\to f$ a.e., $g_n \to g$ a.e. and $g_n = f_n$ a.e. implies $f=g$ a.e.
- Does the sum $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{2^k \cdot |x-r_k|^\frac{1}{2}}$ coverges a.e?
- Uniform convergence of finite sum of functions
- Almost surely convergence of a monotone stochastic process
- Does almost everywhere equality means equality on the quotient space?
- Extending continuous functions from almost everywhere to everywhere
- Sufficient conditions for $L^2$ convergence implying almost everywhere convergence.
Related Questions in RADON-NIKODYM
- Prove $E^{\mathbb Q}[Y]=E^{\mathbb P}[XY]$ if $E^{\mathbb P}[X]=\mathbb P(X>0)=1$ and $ \mathbb Q(A)=E^{\mathbb Q}[X1_A] $
- Computing expectation under a change of measure
- Show that the Radon-Nikodym density is $\mathcal{G}$ measurable iff $E_P[X|G] = E_Q[X|G]$
- ergodic measure and absolutely continuous measure
- What is the Radon-Nikodym density $dP^∗ /d P$ of the unique $P^ ∗ ∼ P$ such that the discounted price $S^*_t := S_t /B_t$ is a $P^∗$-martingale
- Application of chain rule, is this correct?
- Radon Nikodym derivative $\frac{\mathrm d(fλ)}{\mathrm d(gλ)}$
- Radon-Nykodym Derivative process-Property of Conditional Expectation
- Finding the Radon-Nikodym Derivative
- The Dual of $L^{\infty}$ and the Radon-Nikodym Theorem
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Technically, there is no single function which is the Radon-Nikodym derivative. When we say $f$ is a Radon-Nikodym derivative, we mean it's a measurable function $\Omega \to [0, \infty)$ defined everywhere, satisfying the rule $$\nu(A) = \int_A f \ d\mu\tag{1}.$$
The Radon-Nikodym theorem says that if $\nu \ll \mu$, such an $f$ must exist, and any two such $f, g$ must agree $\mu$-almost-everywhere. When we talk about the Radon-Nikodym derivative, we're actually talking about the equivalence class of functions $f$ satisfying $(1)$, not any one specific function.
Edit: to be clear, in general there is no single function which is the derivative, even if that function is allowed to be undefined on a set of null measure. Any two derivatives $f$ and $g$ can disagree at any point $x$ satisfying $\mu(\{x\}) = 0$; if $\mu$ is Lesbegue measure, the two derivatives $f$ and $g$ can disagree anywhere.
When we say the derivative is "defined almost everywhere", it's shorthand for the result above; it's not a literal statement about a specific derivative function.